CNS & Pain Discovery Research, AstraZeneca Pharmaceuticals, Wilmington, DE 19850, USA.
Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2010 Oct;13(9):1269-84. doi: 10.1017/S1461145710000866. Epub 2010 Aug 18.
Innovation is essential for the identification of novel pharmacological therapies to meet the treatment needs of patients with psychiatric disorders. However, over the last 20 yr, in spite of major investments targets falling outside the classical aminergic mechanisms have shown diminished returns. The disappointments are traced to failures in the target identification and target validation effort, as reflected by the poor ability of current bioassays and animal models to predict efficacy and side-effects. Mismatch between disease biology and how psychiatric diseases are categorized has resulted in clinical trials of highly specific agents in heterogeneous patients, leading to variable treatment effects and failed studies. As drug hunters, one sees the opportunity to overhaul the pharmaceutical research and development (R&D) process. Improvements in both preclinical and clinical translational research need to be considered. Linking pharmacodynamic markers with disease biology should provide more predictive and innovative early clinical trials which in turn will increase the success rate of discovering new medicines. However, to exploit these exciting scientific discoveries, pharmaceutical companies need to question the conventional drug research and development model which is silo-driven, non-integrative across the confines of a company, non-disclosing across the pharmaceutical industry, and often independent from academia. This leads to huge redundancy in effort and lack of contextual learning in real time. Nevertheless, there are signs that drug discovery in the 21st century will see more intentional government, academic and industrial collaborations to overcome the above challenges that could eventually link mechanistic disease biology to segments of patients, affording them the benefits of rational and targeted therapy.
创新对于发现新的药理学疗法以满足精神障碍患者的治疗需求至关重要。然而,在过去的 20 年中,尽管在传统的胺能机制之外投入了大量资金,但目标却收效甚微。这些失望可以追溯到目标识别和验证工作的失败,这反映出现有的生物测定和动物模型预测疗效和副作用的能力很差。疾病生物学与精神疾病分类之间的不匹配导致了高度特异性药物在异质患者中的临床试验,导致治疗效果的变异性和研究失败。作为药物探索者,我们看到了彻底改革药物研发 (R&D) 流程的机会。需要考虑改善临床前和临床转化研究。将药效标志物与疾病生物学联系起来,应该提供更具预测性和创新性的早期临床试验,从而提高发现新药的成功率。然而,为了利用这些令人兴奋的科学发现,制药公司需要质疑传统的药物研发模式,这种模式是孤立驱动的,在公司内部没有整合,在制药行业内没有公开,而且往往与学术界脱节。这导致了巨大的重复性,并且缺乏实时的上下文学习。尽管如此,有迹象表明,21 世纪的药物发现将看到更多的政府、学术和工业合作,以克服上述挑战,最终将机制疾病生物学与患者的某些部分联系起来,使他们受益于合理和靶向治疗。