Department of Ophthalmology, Zagazig University, Zagazig, Egypt.
J Glaucoma. 2011 Sep;20(7):458-63. doi: 10.1097/IJG.0b013e3181efbea5.
Evaluate the use of bevacizumab (avastin) injected around valve body intraoperatively versus the use of mitomycin C as a single intraoperative application at the site of Ahmed valve implantation to enhance the survival of Ahmed valve in cases of pediatric glaucoma's as regarding the efficacy and complications.
Twenty eyes of 16 patients with pediatric glaucoma underwent Ahmed valve implantation with bevacizumab (avastin) (1.25 mg in 0.05 mL) injected around the valve body after completing the surgery compared with 20 eyes of 14 patients with pediatric glaucoma who underwent Ahmed valve implantation with application of mitomycin C (0.4 mg/mL for 3 min) before valve implantation and 20 eyes of 18 patients managed by Ahmed valve only (control group). The follow-up period was 12 months.
The results revealed that 80% total success (70% complete success and 10% qualified success) in first group in which avastin augmented Ahmed valve was performed compared with group II in which mitomycin C was used during Ahmed valve implantation 90% total success (80% complete success and 10% qualified success) and this difference between the 2 groups was nonsignificant (P>0.05), but in group III complete success occurred in (60%) only with no cases of qualified success (P>0.05).
The adjunctive use of bevacizumab or mitomycin C during Ahmed valve implantation significantly enhances the valve survival and the first drug seems to be much safer with no visually devastating complications.
评估在 Ahmed 阀植入部位术中单次应用丝裂霉素 C 与在阀门周围注射贝伐单抗(Avastin)以增强小儿青光眼 Ahmed 阀存活的效果,比较两种方法在疗效和并发症方面的差异。
对 16 例(20 眼)小儿青光眼患者行 Ahmed 阀植入术,术后在阀门周围注射贝伐单抗(1.25mg/0.05ml)(观察组),并与 14 例(20 眼)术中应用丝裂霉素 C(0.4mg/ml,3 分钟)的小儿青光眼患者(对照组)及仅行 Ahmed 阀植入术的 18 例(20 眼)患者(对照组)进行比较。随访 12 个月。
观察组的总成功率为 80%(完全成功率 70%,部分成功率 10%),对照组的总成功率为 90%(完全成功率 80%,部分成功率 10%),两组间差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。但在对照组中,仅 60%的患者完全成功,无部分成功病例(P>0.05)。
在 Ahmed 阀植入术中联合应用贝伐单抗或丝裂霉素 C 可显著提高阀门的存活率,且前者似乎更安全,无视觉毁灭性并发症。