Suppr超能文献

在手部冰冷的情况下,哪个参数更可靠,神经传导速度(NCV)还是潜伏期?

Which parameter is more reliable in a cold hand, NCV or latency.

作者信息

Shooshtari S M Jazayeri, Abolahrari S, Sedaghat P, Taghizadeh S H, Gbaem H, Moghtaderi A R

机构信息

Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Iran.

出版信息

Electromyogr Clin Neurophysiol. 2010 Jul-Aug;50(5):235-8.

Abstract

Temperature affects distal sensory & motor latencies & nerve conduction velocity but not necessarily at the same degree. Purpose of this study is to see which one is affected less and thus could be more reliable in cold conditions. A total of 32 healthy individuals with age range of 18-28 years (mean 22.25 +/- 2.2) participated in this study. Skin Temperature was recorded at wrist. Distal median motor & sensory latencies and transcarpal median NCV were recorded before and after immersion in cold water. Statistical analysis was performed using paired t-test with SPSS. All parameters were affected by cold but the effect was less dramatic in transcarpal NCV. Transcarpal median NCV is least affected parameter by cold, so it may be more reliable than sensory & motor latencies at wrist.

摘要

温度会影响远端感觉和运动潜伏期以及神经传导速度,但影响程度不一定相同。本研究的目的是确定哪一项受影响较小,从而在寒冷条件下可能更可靠。共有32名年龄在18至28岁(平均22.25 +/- 2.2)的健康个体参与了本研究。在手腕处记录皮肤温度。在冷水浸泡前后记录远端正中神经运动和感觉潜伏期以及经腕部正中神经传导速度(NCV)。使用SPSS进行配对t检验进行统计分析。所有参数均受寒冷影响,但经腕部NCV的影响较小。经腕部正中神经NCV是受寒冷影响最小的参数,因此它可能比手腕处的感觉和运动潜伏期更可靠。

相似文献

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验