• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

PMID:20722159
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This review is an update for the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force (USPSTF) on universal newborn hearing screening (UNHS) to detect moderate to severe permanent, bilateral congenital hearing loss. The review focuses on 3 key questions regarding the effectiveness of universal screening and early interventions in improving language and other outcomes in childhood, the effectiveness of universal screening in identifying infants with hearing loss and leading them to early interventions, and adverse effects of screening and early interventions.

METHODOLOGY

Literature searches of MEDLINE and Cochrane databases (2000–November 2007) were conducted to systematically identify articles addressing the 3 key questions published since the prior recommendation in 2001. Additional articles were obtained from reference lists of related reviews, studies, editorials, reports, websites, and by consulting experts. Articles were subjected to inclusion and exclusion criteria, data from included studies were abstracted, and studies were rated for quality with pre-determined criteria. Results were summarized descriptively in tables. An outcomes table estimating the number needed to screen was determined using estimates from the most relevant studies.

RESULTS

A good-quality retrospective study of children with hearing loss indicates that those who had early versus late confirmation and those who had undergone UNHS versus none had better receptive language at age 8 years, but not better expressive language or speech. A good-quality nonrandomized trial of a large birth cohort indicates that infants identified with hearing loss through UNHS have earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those not screened. These findings are corroborated by multiple descriptive studies of ages of referral, diagnosis, and treatment. Universal newborn hearing screening programs have low false-positive and referral rates and are generally well accepted and tolerated by parents of newborns. Studies indicate that usual parental reactions to an initial non-pass on a hearing screen include worry, questioning, and distress. These negative emotions resolve for most parents when a diagnostic test is provided with a normal result. Little information exists about the adverse effects of early interventions, although cochlear implants are associated with higher risks for bacterial meningitis in young children.

CONCLUSIONS

Children with hearing loss who had UNHS have better language outcomes at school age than those not screened. Infants identified with hearing loss through universal screening have significantly earlier referral, diagnosis, and treatment than those identified in other ways.

摘要

相似文献

1
2
Universal newborn hearing screening: systematic review to update the 2001 US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation.新生儿听力普遍筛查:系统评价以更新2001年美国预防服务工作组的建议。
Pediatrics. 2008 Jul;122(1):e266-76. doi: 10.1542/peds.2007-1422.
3
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
4
Universal newborn hearing screening: summary of evidence.新生儿听力普遍筛查:证据总结
JAMA. 2001;286(16):2000-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.286.16.2000.
5
6
Projected cost-effectiveness of statewide universal newborn hearing screening.全州范围内新生儿普遍听力筛查的预计成本效益。
Pediatrics. 2002 Nov;110(5):855-64. doi: 10.1542/peds.110.5.855.
7
8
9
10
Screening for speech and language delay in preschool children: systematic evidence review for the US Preventive Services Task Force.学龄前儿童言语和语言发育迟缓筛查:美国预防服务工作组的系统证据综述
Pediatrics. 2006 Feb;117(2):e298-319. doi: 10.1542/peds.2005-1467.