Suppr超能文献

肾部分切除术后延长缺血时间的肾功能结果优于根治性肾切除术。

Renal functional outcomes after partial nephrectomy with extended ischemic intervals are better than after radical nephrectomy.

机构信息

Michigan State University, Grand Rapids, Michigan, USA.

出版信息

J Urol. 2010 Oct;184(4):1286-90. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2010.06.011. Epub 2010 Aug 17.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Partial nephrectomy is now a standard of care for clinical stage T1 renal cancers amenable to a nephron sparing approach. Based on tumor size and location, some partial nephrectomies can be more challenging and necessitate longer ischemic intervals, and radical nephrectomy is considered an alternative standard of care for these tumors. We evaluate whether partial nephrectomy with extended ischemia provides improved renal functional outcomes compared with radical nephrectomy.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Renal functional outcomes were analyzed in 2,402 consecutive patients with serum creatinine 1.4 mg/dl or less and 2 functioning kidneys treated for cT1 renal cancer at Cleveland Clinic with partial (1,833, 76%) or radical nephrectomy (569, 24%). Patients treated with partial nephrectomy were grouped according to duration of ischemia using the categories of limited (less than 30 minutes), unknown or extended (greater than 30 minutes).

RESULTS

Patients in all 4 groups had similar preoperative creatinine (median 0.9 mg/dl) and estimated glomerular filtration rate (median 82 to 84 ml/minute/1.73 m(2)). Patients undergoing radical nephrectomy on average were older, and had more comorbidities and larger tumors (p <0.001). Regardless of type of surgery, this cohort as a whole was at low risk (less than 1%) for renal failure (estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 15 ml/minute/1.73 m(2)). However, patients in the radical nephrectomy cohort were far more likely (p <0.001) to have an estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 45 ml/minute/1.73 m(2) (35%) than any of the partial nephrectomy groups (limited 11%, unknown 15%, extended ischemia 19%).

CONCLUSIONS

Even when performed with extended ischemia, partial nephrectomy is associated with renal functional outcomes superior to those of radical nephrectomy for clinical stage T1 renal cancers. Partial nephrectomy should be considered even for tumors in which anticipated ischemia may exceed 30 minutes.

摘要

目的

对于适合保留肾单位手术的临床 T1 期肾癌,部分肾切除术现在是一种标准的治疗方法。根据肿瘤的大小和位置,一些部分肾切除术可能更具挑战性,需要更长的缺血间隔,根治性肾切除术被认为是这些肿瘤的替代标准治疗方法。我们评估延长缺血时间的部分肾切除术与根治性肾切除术相比是否能提供更好的肾功能结果。

材料和方法

在克利夫兰诊所接受治疗的 2402 例血清肌酐<1.4mg/dl 且有 2 个功能肾的 cT1 肾癌患者中,分析了肾功能结果,这些患者接受了部分(1833 例,76%)或根治性肾切除术(569 例,24%)。根据缺血时间的长短,接受部分肾切除术的患者分为以下几组:局限性(<30 分钟)、未知或延长性(>30 分钟)。

结果

4 组患者的术前肌酐(中位数 0.9mg/dl)和估算肾小球滤过率(中位数 82-84ml/min/1.73m²)相似。接受根治性肾切除术的患者平均年龄较大,合并症较多,肿瘤较大(p<0.001)。无论手术类型如何,整个队列发生肾衰竭(估算肾小球滤过率<15ml/min/1.73m²)的风险都较低(<1%)。然而,根治性肾切除术组患者发生估算肾小球滤过率<45ml/min/1.73m²的可能性要大得多(p<0.001)(35%),而任何一组部分肾切除术患者都没有(局限性组 11%,未知组 15%,延长缺血组 19%)。

结论

即使在延长缺血的情况下,部分肾切除术也与临床 T1 期肾癌的根治性肾切除术相比,具有更好的肾功能结果。即使预计缺血时间可能超过 30 分钟,也应考虑行部分肾切除术。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验