Suppr超能文献

评估婚姻关系的两种方法的效标效度。

Criterion validity of two methods of evaluating marital relationships.

作者信息

Patton D, Waring E M

机构信息

Hotel Dieu Hospital, Kingston, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

J Sex Marital Ther. 1991 Spring;17(1):22-6. doi: 10.1080/00926239108405465.

Abstract

A structured interview and a self-report questionnaire designed to measure the quality and quantity of marital intimacy are examined by evaluating their relationship to a measure of marital adjustment. Conceptual and methodological questions regarding different techniques that measure marital quality are presented. The study suggests both techniques have established criterion validity. Advantages and disadvantages of both methods are discussed, and suggestion for future research are made.

摘要

通过评估其与婚姻调适度量的关系,对旨在测量婚姻亲密程度的质量和数量的结构化访谈和自我报告问卷进行了检验。提出了关于测量婚姻质量的不同技术的概念性和方法性问题。该研究表明这两种技术都已确立了效标效度。讨论了两种方法的优缺点,并对未来研究提出了建议。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验