• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

贝伐珠单抗联合培美曲塞治疗意大利和德国晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本。

Costs of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy and Germany.

机构信息

Thoraxklinik Heidelberg GmbH, Germany.

出版信息

Lung Cancer. 2010 Aug;69 Suppl 1:S18-23. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70134-3.

DOI:10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70134-3
PMID:20727458
Abstract

The new targeted agent bevacizumab in combination with cisplatin and gemcitabine, and a third-generation chemotherapy pemetrexed in combination with cisplatin, have been approved as first-line treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). An indirect comparison between bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine and pemetrexed plus cisplatin showed that bevacizumab (plus cisplatin and gemcitabine) achieved a favourable hazard ratio in terms of progression-free survival among patients with advanced NSCLC. This analysis aimed to compare the monthly cost of these treatments for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy and Germany. The comparison used country specific cost data and adopted the payer perspective in Italy and Germany. The monthly cost of bevacizumab, including administration cost, as a single agent was 1,509 euro and 2,564 euro less than pemetrexed in Italy and Germany, respectively. The monthly treatment cost of bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine was 1,001 euro and 446 euro less than pemetrexed plus gemcitabine in Italy and Germany, respectively. Results indicate that clinical benefits with bevacizumab plus cisplatin and gemcitabine therapy are achieved at a lower monthly cost than pemetrexed plus gemcitabine doublet therapy. Therefore, from a budget perspective, bevacizumab should be considered as a preferred targeted treatment of choice for advanced non-squamous NSCLC.

摘要

贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂和吉西他滨,以及第三代化疗培美曲塞联合顺铂,已被批准作为晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)患者的一线治疗药物。贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂和吉西他滨与培美曲塞联合顺铂的间接比较表明,贝伐珠单抗(联合顺铂和吉西他滨)在晚期 NSCLC 患者的无进展生存期方面具有有利的风险比。本分析旨在比较意大利和德国晚期非鳞状 NSCLC 患者使用这些治疗方法的每月成本。该比较使用了特定国家的成本数据,并在意大利和德国采用了支付者的角度。在意大利和德国,贝伐珠单抗(包括管理费用)作为单一药物的每月费用比培美曲塞分别低 1509 欧元和 2564 欧元。贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂和吉西他滨的每月治疗费用比培美曲塞联合吉西他滨分别低 1001 欧元和 446 欧元。结果表明,与培美曲塞联合吉西他滨治疗相比,贝伐珠单抗联合顺铂和吉西他滨治疗的临床获益具有更低的每月成本。因此,从预算角度来看,贝伐珠单抗应被视为晚期非鳞状 NSCLC 的首选靶向治疗药物。

相似文献

1
Costs of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy and Germany.贝伐珠单抗联合培美曲塞治疗意大利和德国晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本。
Lung Cancer. 2010 Aug;69 Suppl 1:S18-23. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70134-3.
2
Cost-effectiveness analysis of bevacizumab versus pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy.贝伐珠单抗对比培美曲塞治疗意大利晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本效果分析。
Lung Cancer. 2010 Aug;69 Suppl 1:S11-7. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70133-1.
3
Effectiveness of bevacizumab- and pemetrexed-cisplatin treatment for patients with advanced non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer.贝伐珠单抗联合培美曲塞和顺铂治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的疗效。
Lung Cancer. 2010 Aug;69 Suppl 1:S4-10. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5002(10)70132-X.
4
An indirect comparison of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-gemcitabine and cisplatin plus pemetrexed treatment for patients with advanced first-line non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer in East Asia.东亚地区晚期一线非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者使用贝伐单抗联合顺铂-吉西他滨与顺铂联合培美曲塞治疗的间接比较。
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;7 Suppl 2:13-21. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01398.x.
5
Costs of bevacizumab and pemetrexed for advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Italy and Germany.意大利和德国贝伐单抗与培美曲塞用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的费用。
Lung Cancer. 2011 Feb;71(2):244; author reply 245. doi: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2010.10.004. Epub 2010 Nov 4.
6
Cost-effectiveness of bevacizumab-based therapy versus cisplatin plus pemetrexed for the first-line treatment of advanced non-squamous NSCLC in Korea and Taiwan.在韩国和台湾地区,贝伐单抗为基础的治疗方案与顺铂联合培美曲塞用于晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌一线治疗的成本效益分析
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;7 Suppl 2:22-33. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01399.x.
7
Cost-effectiveness of continuation maintenance pemetrexed after cisplatin and pemetrexed chemotherapy for advanced nonsquamous non-small-cell lung cancer: estimates from the perspective of the Chinese health care system.顺铂和培美曲塞化疗后继续培美曲塞维持治疗晚期非鳞状非小细胞肺癌的成本效益:来自中国医疗保健系统视角的评估。
Clin Ther. 2013 Jan;35(1):54-65. doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2012.12.013.
8
Pemetrexed plus platinum or gemcitabine plus platinum for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: final survival analysis from a multicentre randomized phase II trial in the East Asia region and a meta-analysis.培美曲塞联合铂类或吉西他滨联合铂类治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌:东亚地区多中心随机二期临床试验的最终生存分析及荟萃分析。
Respirology. 2013 Jan;18(1):131-9. doi: 10.1111/j.1440-1843.2012.02248.x.
9
Pemetrexed for the first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic non-small cell lung cancer.培美曲塞用于治疗局部晚期或转移性非小细胞肺癌的一线药物。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14 Suppl 1:47-53. doi: 10.3310/hta14Suppl1/07.
10
Comparative effectiveness of bevacizumab plus cisplatin-based chemotherapy versus pemetrexed plus cisplatin treatment in East Asian non-squamous non-small cell lung cancer patients applying real-life outcomes.在东亚非鳞状非小细胞肺癌患者中应用实际治疗结果比较贝伐单抗联合铂类化疗与培美曲塞联合铂类治疗的疗效
Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2011 Jun;7 Suppl 2:34-40. doi: 10.1111/j.1743-7563.2011.01400.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Economic evaluation of first-line and maintenance treatments for advanced non-small cell lung cancer: a systematic review.晚期非小细胞肺癌一线及维持治疗的经济学评价:一项系统评价
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2014 Dec 15;7:9-15. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S43328. eCollection 2015.
2
The impact of chemotherapy-induced side effects on medical care usage and cost in German hospital care--an observational analysis on non-small-cell lung cancer patients.化疗引起的副作用对德国医院护理中医疗保健使用和成本的影响——非小细胞肺癌患者的观察性分析。
Support Care Cancer. 2013 Jun;21(6):1665-75. doi: 10.1007/s00520-012-1711-5. Epub 2013 Jan 23.
3
Economic evaluation of bevacizumab in the treatment of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
贝伐单抗治疗非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的经济学评价。
Clinicoecon Outcomes Res. 2012;4:201-8. doi: 10.2147/CEOR.S27770. Epub 2012 Jul 25.