Sanuki Takuro, Sugioka Shingo, Hirokane Motoko, Son Hiroki, Uda Rumiko, Akatsuka Masafumi, Kotani Junichiro
Department of Anesthesiology, Osaka Dental University, Chuo-ku, Osaka, Japan.
J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Apr;69(4):1018-22. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.03.015. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
This study was performed to determine the optimal degree of mouth opening in anesthetized patients requiring laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during oral surgery.
A single, experienced LMA user inserted the LMA in 15 patients who were scheduled for elective oral surgery. Oropharyngeal leak pressure, intracuff pressure, and fiberoptic assessment of the LMA position were sequentially documented in 5 mouth conditions-opening of 1.4 (neutral position), 2, 3, 4, and 5 cm-and any resulting ventilatory difficulties were recorded.
Oropharyngeal leak pressure with the mouth open 4 cm (21.8 ± 3.2 cm H(2)O, P = .025) and 5 cm (27.3 ± 7.2 cm H(2)O, P < .001) was significantly higher than in the neutral position (18.1 ± 1.5 cm H(2)O), as was intracuff pressure (neutral position, 60.0 ± 0 cm H(2)O; 4 cm, 72.6 ± 5.1 cm H(2)O [P < .001]; and 5 cm, 86.9 ± 14.4 cm H(2)O [P < .001]). LMA position, observed by fiberoptic bronchoscopy, was unchanged by mouth opening, being similar in the 5 mouth conditions (P = .999). In addition, ventilation difficulties (abnormal capnograph curves or inadequate tidal volume) occurred in 2 of 15 patients (13%) and 7 of 15 patients (53%) (P < .001) with the mouth opening of 4 and 5 cm, respectively.
This study showed that a mouth opening over 4 cm led to substantial increases in oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure of the LMA, warranting caution, because gastric insufflation, sore throat, and ventilation difficulties may occur. A mouth opening of 3 cm achieves acceptable airway conditions for anesthetized patients requiring LMA.
本研究旨在确定口腔手术中需要喉罩气道(LMA)的麻醉患者的最佳开口程度。
一位经验丰富的LMA使用者为15例择期口腔手术患者插入LMA。在5种开口状态下(开口度分别为1.4cm(中立位)、2cm、3cm、4cm和5cm),依次记录口咽漏气压、套囊内压以及通过纤维支气管镜评估LMA位置,并记录由此产生的任何通气困难。
开口度为4cm(21.8±3.2cmH₂O,P = 0.025)和5cm(27.3±7.2cmH₂O,P < 0.001)时的口咽漏气压显著高于中立位(18.1±1.5cmH₂O),套囊内压也是如此(中立位,60.0±0cmH₂O;4cm,72.6±5.1cmH₂O[P < 0.001];5cm,86.9±14.4cmH₂O[P < 0.001])。通过纤维支气管镜观察,LMA位置在不同开口度下未发生改变,在5种开口状态下相似(P = 0.999)。此外,开口度为4cm和5cm时,15例患者中分别有2例(13%)和7例(53%)出现通气困难(异常的二氧化碳波形图曲线或潮气量不足)(P < 0.001)。
本研究表明,开口度超过4cm会导致LMA的口咽漏气压和套囊内压大幅升高,需谨慎操作,因为可能会发生胃内充气、咽痛和通气困难。对于需要LMA的麻醉患者,3cm的开口度可实现可接受的气道条件。