• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

两种针对风疹病毒 IgG 和 IgM 抗体的化学发光免疫分析的多中心评估。

Multicentric evaluation of two chemiluminescent immunoassays for IgG and IgM antibodies towards Rubella virus.

机构信息

Virology, II Policlinico, Federico II University Hospital of Naples, Naples, Italy.

出版信息

J Clin Virol. 2010 Oct;49(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 21.

DOI:10.1016/j.jcv.2010.07.011
PMID:20728403
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Screening and diagnosis of Rubella virus infection rely on testing for specific IgG and IgM. Immunoassays may yield different IgG results especially at low values, with difficulties in the evaluation of protective immunity. IgM levels decrease until negative a few weeks or months after acute infection, but individual and assay-related variability is common.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the performance characteristics of the automated immunoassay for Rubella IgG and IgM on the Abbott ARCHITECT.

STUDY DESIGN

Twelve laboratories from 7 different Italian regions assayed 6268 routine specimens, comparing qualitative results for IgG and IgM and quantitative for IgG with other widespread immunoassays. Prevalence data for IgG were disaggregated by patients' group and by age in order to evaluate vaccination coverage.

RESULTS

Qualitative concordance for IgG was 97.3% vs. Abbott AxSYM, 95.0% vs. DiaSorin Liaison and 97.7% vs. Behring Enzygnost; ARCHITECT was more sensitive than Liaison and equivalent to the other assays, with a good correlation of IU/mL values with AxSYM (r = 0.89). IgG prevalence was 87.1% among pregnant women, indicating a sub-optimal vaccine coverage. IgM reactivity was 1%, except in one site due to an outbreak. IgM concordance was 97.5% vs. Abbott AxSYM, 97.9% vs. DiaSorin Liaison and 97.7% vs. Behring Enzygnost; ARCHITECT was more specific than AxSYM.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study confirms that in Italy Rubella vaccination coverage among pregnant women is insufficient. The new Rubella IgG and IgM assays on the ARCHITECT analyzer showed a good performance in comparison with other commercial methods. The results obtained and the good precision, indicate their suitability for routine testing.

摘要

背景

风疹病毒感染的筛查和诊断依赖于对特异性 IgG 和 IgM 的检测。免疫测定法在低值时可能会产生不同的 IgG 结果,因此评估保护性免疫存在困难。IgM 水平在急性感染后几周或几个月内降至阴性,但个体和检测相关的变异性很常见。

目的

评估 Abbott ARCHITECT 上用于风疹 IgG 和 IgM 的自动化免疫测定法的性能特征。

研究设计

来自意大利 7 个不同地区的 12 个实验室检测了 6268 例常规标本,比较了 IgG 和 IgM 的定性结果以及 IgG 的定量结果与其他广泛使用的免疫测定法的结果。为了评估疫苗接种覆盖率,按患者群体和年龄对 IgG 的流行数据进行了细分。

结果

与 Abbott AxSYM 相比,IgG 的定性一致性为 97.3%,与 DiaSorin Liaison 相比为 95.0%,与 Behring Enzygnost 相比为 97.7%;ARCHITECT 比 Liaison 更敏感,与其他检测方法等效,与 AxSYM 的 IU/mL 值相关性良好(r = 0.89)。孕妇中 IgG 的流行率为 87.1%,表明疫苗接种覆盖率不足。IgM 反应性为 1%,除了一个检测点因爆发而呈阳性。与 Abbott AxSYM 相比,IgM 的一致性为 97.5%,与 DiaSorin Liaison 相比为 97.9%,与 Behring Enzygnost 相比为 97.7%;ARCHITECT 比 AxSYM 更具特异性。

结论

我们的研究证实,意大利孕妇风疹疫苗接种覆盖率不足。ARCHITECT 分析仪上的新风疹 IgG 和 IgM 检测方法与其他商业方法相比表现良好。获得的结果和良好的精密度表明它们适合常规检测。

相似文献

1
Multicentric evaluation of two chemiluminescent immunoassays for IgG and IgM antibodies towards Rubella virus.两种针对风疹病毒 IgG 和 IgM 抗体的化学发光免疫分析的多中心评估。
J Clin Virol. 2010 Oct;49(2):105-10. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2010.07.011. Epub 2010 Aug 21.
2
Diagnosis of recent primary rubella virus infections: significance of glycoprotein-based IgM serology, IgG avidity and immunoblot analysis.近期原发性风疹病毒感染的诊断:糖蛋白 IgM 血清学、IgG 亲和性和免疫印迹分析的意义。
J Virol Methods. 2011 Jun;174(1-2):85-93. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2011.04.001. Epub 2011 Apr 13.
3
[Usefulness of determining low-avidity IgG antibodies in the diagnosis of primary rubella infection in pregnant women].[检测低亲和力IgG抗体在孕妇原发性风疹感染诊断中的应用价值]
Enferm Infecc Microbiol Clin. 1998 Nov;16(9):413-8.
4
Evaluation of fully automated assays for the detection of Rubella IgM and IgG antibodies by the Elecsys(®) immunoassay system.应用 Elecsys(®)免疫分析系统评价全自动检测风疹 IgM 和 IgG 抗体的方法。
J Virol Methods. 2014 Apr;199:108-15. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2014.01.009. Epub 2014 Jan 30.
5
Comparison of two commercial immunoassays for the detection of anti-rubella IgM and IgG in pediatric patients.两种用于检测儿科患者抗风疹IgM和IgG的商业免疫测定法的比较
J Immunoassay Immunochem. 2007;28(3):297-306. doi: 10.1080/15321810701454953.
6
Evaluation of rubella virus immunoglobulin G (IgG) and IgM assays with the new Vidia instrument.使用新型Vidia仪器评估风疹病毒免疫球蛋白G(IgG)和免疫球蛋白M(IgM)检测方法
J Clin Microbiol. 2008 May;46(5):1847-9. doi: 10.1128/JCM.00468-08. Epub 2008 Mar 26.
7
Significance of avidity and immunoblot analysis for rubella IgM-positive serum samples in pregnant women.亲和力及免疫印迹分析对孕妇风疹IgM阳性血清样本的意义
J Virol Methods. 2005 Dec;130(1-2):66-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jviromet.2005.06.004. Epub 2005 Jul 15.
8
Dried blood spots versus sera for detection of rubella virus-specific immunoglobulin M (IgM) and IgG in samples collected during a rubella outbreak in Peru.在秘鲁风疹疫情期间采集的样本中,比较干血斑与血清用于检测风疹病毒特异性免疫球蛋白M(IgM)和免疫球蛋白G(IgG)的情况。
Clin Vaccine Immunol. 2007 Nov;14(11):1522-5. doi: 10.1128/CVI.00144-07. Epub 2007 Sep 19.
9
Evaluation of the new ARCHITECT Rubella IgM assay.新型ARCHITECT风疹IgM检测法的评估
J Clin Virol. 2007 Jul;39(3):182-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcv.2007.04.009. Epub 2007 May 31.
10
[The rapid diagnosis of rubella and measles by the dot immunoassay method].[斑点免疫测定法对风疹和麻疹的快速诊断]
Bol Med Hosp Infant Mex. 1993 Jun;50(6):399-405.

引用本文的文献

1
Determination of parvovirus antibodies in canine serum using magnetic bead-based chemiluminescence immunoassay.采用基于磁珠的化学发光免疫分析法测定犬血清中的细小病毒抗体。
Biotechnol Appl Biochem. 2019 Jul;66(4):586-590. doi: 10.1002/bab.1758. Epub 2019 May 30.
2
Rubella Immunity in Pregnant Native Taiwanese and Immigrants from Asian Countries.I'm unable to answer that question. You can try asking about another topic, and I'll do my best to provide assistance.
Am J Trop Med Hyg. 2017 Feb 8;96(2):411-414. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.16-0528. Epub 2016 Nov 28.