Lachenbruch Charles
Surface Research and Development, Hill-Rom, Batesville, Indiana, USA.
Ostomy Wound Manage. 2010 Aug;56(8):52-60.
To ensure appropriate fluid replacement, caregivers need to understand the effect of support surfaces on the rate of moisture loss from the body. A prospective study was conducted to 1) measure the rate of weight (fluid) loss on an air-fluidized therapy (AFT) surface; 2) determine the effect of bath temperature on weight loss; 3) compare weight loss and skin temperatures between foam and low-air loss (LAL) surfaces; 4) compare characteristics of individuals with high and low weight loss rates; and 5) compare weight loss rates to previously measured rates of support surface evaporative capacity. Eight healthy adult volunteers (three men, five women, average age 33 years, average body mass index 31.0 kg/m²) participated in eight 180-minute trials (one trial per day) on a foam, an LAL, and an AFT surface at five different bath temperatures (range: ~99.0 °F [hot] to ~88.0 °F [low]). Weight (± 10 g) was obtained before and after each trial and skin temperature (across the back) was recorded continuously. Using linear regression, weight loss rate on AFT was found to be strongly dependent upon bath temperatures: weight loss/day (g/m²-24 hours) = 53.9 x T (F) - 4030, where T is the mean skin temperature on the patient's back (also equal to bath temperature) in (F) Fahrenheit. Using this regression equation at mid-range (94 °F), fluid loss in an average woman (145 lb/64.5 inches/1.72 m² body surface area [BSA]) on AFT would be estimated to be 850 g/day higher than on foam. Compared with LAL, weight loss on AFT was estimated to be 700 g/day and 800 g/day higher for the typical woman and man, respectively (P < 0.05 at a mid-range bath temperature of 94 °F). Weight loss rates varied from 480 g/m²-24 hours to 3,470 g/m²-24 hours. Weight loss and mattress evaporative rates also suggest that moisture accumulation may occur on a foam but not on an LAL or AFT surface. However, fluid intake should be increased on AFT, particularly when bath temperature settings are high.
为确保适当的液体补充,护理人员需要了解支撑面对于身体水分流失速率的影响。开展了一项前瞻性研究,以:1)测量在气悬浮治疗(AFT)表面的体重(液体)流失速率;2)确定洗浴温度对体重减轻的影响;3)比较泡沫床垫和低空气流失(LAL)床垫表面的体重减轻和皮肤温度;4)比较体重减轻率高和低的个体特征;5)将体重减轻率与先前测量的支撑面蒸发能力速率进行比较。八名健康成年志愿者(三名男性、五名女性,平均年龄33岁,平均体重指数31.0kg/m²)在泡沫床垫、LAL床垫和AFT床垫表面,于五种不同的洗浴温度(范围:约99.0°F[热]至约88.0°F[低])下参与了八项180分钟的试验(每天一项试验)。在每次试验前后获取体重(±10g),并连续记录背部的皮肤温度。通过线性回归发现,AFT表面的体重减轻率强烈依赖于洗浴温度:体重减轻/天(g/m² - 24小时)= 53.9×T(°F) - 4030,其中T是患者背部的平均皮肤温度(也等于洗浴温度),单位为华氏度(°F)。在中等温度(94°F)下使用此回归方程,对于平均体重的女性(145磅/64.5英寸/1.72m²体表面积[BSA]),AFT表面的液体流失估计比泡沫床垫表面每天高850g。与LAL相比,对于典型的女性和男性,AFT表面的体重减轻估计分别高700g/天和800g/天(在94°F的中等洗浴温度下,P < 0.05)。体重减轻率在480g/m² - 24小时至3470g/m² - 24小时之间变化。体重减轻和床垫蒸发速率还表明,泡沫床垫上可能会出现水分积聚,而LAL或AFT表面则不会。然而,在AFT表面应增加液体摄入量,尤其是当洗浴温度设置较高时。