Emergency Service, University Hospital Center, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Eur J Emerg Med. 2011 Apr;18(2):86-93. doi: 10.1097/MEJ.0b013e32833e79fe.
Accurate identification of major trauma patients in the prehospital setting positively affects survival and resource utilization. Triage algorithms using predictive criteria of injury severity have been identified in paramedic-based prehospital systems. Our rescue system is based on prehospital paramedics and emergency physicians. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of the prehospital triage performed by physicians and to identify the predictive factors leading to errors of triage.
Retrospective study of trauma patients triaged by physicians. Prehospital triage was analyzed using criteria defining major trauma victims (MTVs, Injury Severity Score >15, admission to ICU, need for immediate surgery and death within 48 h). Adequate triage was defined as MTVs oriented to the trauma centre or non-MTV (NMTV) oriented to regional hospitals.
One thousand six hundred and eighty-five patients (blunt trauma 96%) were included (558 MTV and 1127 NMTV). Triage was adequate in 1455 patients (86.4%). Overtriage occurred in 171 cases (10.1%) and undertriage in 59 cases (3.5%). Sensitivity and specificity was 90 and 85%, respectively, whereas positive predictive value and negative predictive value were 75 and 94%, respectively. Using logistic regression analysis, significant (P<0.05) predictors of undertriage were head or thorax injuries (odds ratio >2.5). Predictors of overtriage were paediatric age group, pedestrian or 2 wheel-vehicle road traffic accidents (odds ratio >2.0).
Physicians using clinical judgement provide effective prehospital triage of trauma patients. Only a few factors predicting errors in triage process were identified in this study.
在院前环境中准确识别严重创伤患者可积极影响生存率和资源利用。已经在基于护理人员的院前系统中确定了使用损伤严重程度预测标准的分诊算法。我们的救援系统基于院前护理人员和急诊医生。本研究的目的是评估医生进行的院前分诊的准确性,并确定导致分诊错误的预测因素。
对接受医生分诊的创伤患者进行回顾性研究。使用定义严重创伤患者的标准(损伤严重程度评分>15、收入 ICU、需要立即手术和 48 小时内死亡)来分析院前分诊。适当的分诊定义为将 MTV 分诊到创伤中心或 NMTV 分诊到区域医院。
共纳入 1685 名患者(钝性创伤 96%)(558 名 MTV 和 1127 名 NMTV)。1455 名患者(86.4%)的分诊是适当的。过度分诊发生在 171 例(10.1%),分诊不足发生在 59 例(3.5%)。灵敏度和特异性分别为 90%和 85%,阳性预测值和阴性预测值分别为 75%和 94%。使用逻辑回归分析,头或胸部损伤(比值比>2.5)是分诊不足的显著(P<0.05)预测因素。过度分诊的预测因素是儿科年龄组、行人或两轮车道路交通事故(比值比>2.0)。
医生使用临床判断对创伤患者进行有效的院前分诊。本研究仅确定了少数几个预测分诊过程中出错的因素。