文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压(MGAP):一种新的简单的创伤前分诊评分,可预测创伤患者的死亡率。

Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.

机构信息

Department of Emergency Medicine and Surgery, Université Lyon 1 and Hospices Civils de Lyon, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar;38(3):831-7. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4a67.


DOI:10.1097/CCM.0b013e3181cc4a67
PMID:20068467
Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Prehospital triage of trauma patients is of paramount importance because adequate trauma center referral improves survival. We developed a simple score that is easy to calculate in the prehospital phase. DESIGN: Multicenter prospective observational study. SETTING: Prehospital physician-staffed emergency system in university and nonuniversity hospitals. INTERVENTIONS: We evaluated 1360 trauma patients receiving care from a prehospital mobile intensive care unit in 22 centers in France during 2002. The association of prehospital variables with in-hospital death was tested using logistic regression, and a simple score (the Mechanism, Glasgow coma scale, Age, and Arterial Pressure [MGAP] score) was created and compared with the triage Revised Trauma Score, Revised Trauma Score, and Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. The model was validated in 1003 patients from 2003 through 2005. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: Four independent variables were identified, and each was assigned a number of points proportional to its regression coefficient to provide the MGAP score: Glasgow Coma Scale (from 3-15 points), blunt trauma (4 points), systolic arterial blood pressure (>120 mm Hg: 5 points, 60 to 120 mm Hg: 3 points), and age <60 yrs (5 points). The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve of MGAP was not significantly different from that of the triage Revised Trauma Score or Revised Trauma Score, but when sensitivity was fixed >0.95 (undertriage of 0.05), the MGAP score was more specific and accurate than triage Revised Trauma Score and Revised Trauma Score, approaching those of Trauma Related Injury Severity Score. We defined three risk groups: low (23-29 points), intermediate (18-22 points), and high risk (<18 points). In the derivation cohort, the mortality was 2.8%, 15%, and 48%, respectively. Comparable characteristics of the MGAP score were observed in the validation cohort. CONCLUSION: The MGAP score can accurately predict in-hospital death in trauma patients.

摘要

目的:创伤患者的院前分诊至关重要,因为充分的创伤中心转诊可提高生存率。我们开发了一种简单的评分方法,便于在院前阶段计算。

设计:多中心前瞻性观察性研究。

地点:在法国的 22 个中心,由院前配备医生的急救系统提供服务。

干预措施:我们评估了 2002 年期间在法国 22 个中心的一个院前移动重症监护病房接受治疗的 1360 名创伤患者。使用逻辑回归测试了院前变量与院内死亡的相关性,并创建了一个简单的评分(机制、格拉斯哥昏迷评分、年龄和动脉压评分[MGAP]),并与创伤修订分类评分、修订创伤评分和创伤相关损伤严重程度评分进行了比较。该模型在 2003 年至 2005 年期间的 1003 名患者中得到验证。

测量和主要结果:确定了四个独立变量,每个变量都根据其回归系数分配一定数量的点,以提供 MGAP 评分:格拉斯哥昏迷评分(3-15 分)、钝性创伤(4 分)、收缩压动脉血压(>120mmHg:5 分,60-120mmHg:3 分)和年龄<60 岁(5 分)。MGAP 的接收器操作特性曲线下面积与修订创伤分类评分或修订创伤评分无显著差异,但当灵敏度固定>0.95(漏诊率为 0.05)时,MGAP 评分比修订创伤分类评分和修订创伤评分更具特异性和准确性,接近创伤相关损伤严重程度评分。我们定义了三个风险组:低危(23-29 分)、中危(18-22 分)和高危(<18 分)。在推导队列中,死亡率分别为 2.8%、15%和 48%。在验证队列中观察到 MGAP 评分的可比特征。

结论:MGAP 评分可准确预测创伤患者的院内死亡。

相似文献

[1]
Mechanism, glasgow coma scale, age, and arterial pressure (MGAP): a new simple prehospital triage score to predict mortality in trauma patients.

Crit Care Med. 2010-3

[2]
The motor component does not convey all the mortality prediction capacity of the Glasgow Coma Scale in trauma patients.

Am J Emerg Med. 2011-10-27

[3]
What do prehospital trauma scores predict besides mortality?

J Trauma. 2011-9

[4]
Evaluation and Comparison of Different Prehospital Triage Scores of Trauma Patients on In-Hospital Mortality.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019-1-7

[5]
Correlation Between the Revised Trauma Score and Injury Severity Score: Implications for Prehospital Trauma Triage.

Prehosp Emerg Care. 2019

[6]
Revised trauma scoring system to predict in-hospital mortality in the emergency department: Glasgow Coma Scale, Age, and Systolic Blood Pressure score.

Crit Care. 2011-8-10

[7]
Prediction of intra-hospital mortality after severe trauma: which pre-hospital score is the most accurate?

Injury. 2016-1

[8]
Heart rate variability and its association with mortality in prehospital trauma patients.

J Trauma. 2006-2

[9]
Derivation and validation of an easy-to-compute trauma score that improves prognostication of mortality or the Trauma Rating Index in Age, Glasgow Coma Scale, Respiratory rate and Systolic blood pressure (TRIAGES) score.

Crit Care. 2019-11-21

[10]
The predictive value of field versus arrival Glasgow Coma Scale score and TRISS calculations in moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury.

J Trauma. 2006-5

引用本文的文献

[1]
Development and validation of a practical predicting model for early mortality in polytrauma patients: secondary analysis from Switzerland.

BMJ Open. 2025-6-12

[2]
Biomarkers help identify critically injured patients with only moderate risk of severe injuries in trauma team activation.

Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg. 2025-6-11

[3]
Optimising prehospital trauma triage for older adults: challenges, limitations, and future directions.

Front Med (Lausanne). 2025-4-22

[4]
Predictive performance of prehospital trauma triage tools for resuscitative interventions within 24 hours in high-risk or life-threatening prehospital trauma patients.

BMC Emerg Med. 2025-2-20

[5]
A Systematic Literature Review of Trauma Systems: An Operations Management Perspective.

Adv Rehabil Sci Pract. 2025-1-16

[6]
Assessment of the correlation between the Vittel criteria and the ISS score: A novel approach to pre-hospital severe trauma patient's triage.

Tunis Med. 2024-12-5

[7]
Derivation and validation of the simplified BleedingAudit Triage Trauma (sBATT) score: a simplified trauma score for major trauma patients injured in motor vehicle collisions.

BMJ Open. 2024-12-26

[8]
Predicting Mortality in Trauma Research: Evaluating the Performance of Trauma Scoring Tools in a South African Population.

Cureus. 2024-10-10

[9]
Prehospital undertriage of older injured patients in western Switzerland: an observational cross-sectional study.

Scand J Trauma Resusc Emerg Med. 2024-10-8

[10]
From the borders edge to the brink of death: A case of a traumatic pancreatic injury and Whipple procedure in the Rio Grande Valley.

Trauma Case Rep. 2023-9-23

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索