Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, Department of Internal Medicine, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011 Feb;22(2):169-74. doi: 10.1111/j.1540-8167.2010.01868.x. Epub 2010 Aug 19.
Cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging (cMRI) may provide a noninvasive method to test for pulmonary vein (PV) isolation after ablation for atrial fibrillation (AF) by detecting changes in PV contraction.
PV contraction (the maximal percentage change in PV cross-sectional area [CSA] during the cardiac cycle) measured 1 month before and 2 months after PV isolation was compared in 63 PVs from 16 patients with medically refractory AF. Repeat cMRI imaging and invasive catheter mapping was performed prior to repeat PV ablation in 50 PVs from 14 additional patients with recurrent AF. Contraction in PVs with sustained isolation after the initial ablation was compared to contraction in PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis was performed to determine the optimal cutoff PV contraction value for prediction of PV-atrial reconnection after ablation. The cutoff value was then prospectively tested in 40 PVs from 12 additional patients.
PV contraction decreased after AF ablation (22.4 ± 10% variation in CSA before ablation vs 10.1 ± 8% variation in CSA after ablation, P < 0.00001). PVs with sustained isolation on invasive mapping contracted less than PVs with electrical reconnection to adjacent atrium (13.7 ± 10.6% vs 21.4 ± 9.3%, P = 0.021). PV contraction produced a c-index of 0.74 for prediction of PV-atrial reconnection after ablation and >17% variation in PV CSA predicted reconnection with a sensitivity of 84.6% and specificity of 66.7%.
PV contraction is reduced by ablation. PV contraction measurement may provide a noninvasive method to test for PV isolation after ablation procedures.
心血管磁共振成像(cMRI)可能通过检测肺静脉(PV)收缩的变化,为房颤(AF)消融后检测 PV 隔离提供一种非侵入性方法。
比较 16 例药物难治性 AF 患者的 63 个 PV 消融前 1 个月和消融后 2 个月的 PV 收缩(心脏周期中 PV 横截面积[CSA]的最大百分比变化)。在 14 例复发性 AF 患者的 50 个额外 PV 中,在重复 PV 消融之前进行重复 cMRI 成像和侵入性导管标测。比较初始消融后持续隔离的 PV 收缩与电连接至相邻心房的 PV 收缩。进行接收器操作特征(ROC)曲线分析,以确定消融后预测 PV-心房再连接的最佳 PV 收缩值截断值。然后在 12 例额外患者的 40 个 PV 中前瞻性测试该截断值。
AF 消融后 PV 收缩减少(消融前 CSA 变化 22.4 ± 10%,消融后 CSA 变化 10.1 ± 8%,P < 0.00001)。在侵入性标测中持续隔离的 PV 收缩小于电连接至相邻心房的 PV 收缩(13.7 ± 10.6% vs 21.4 ± 9.3%,P = 0.021)。PV 收缩预测消融后 PV-心房再连接的 c-index 为 0.74,PV CSA 变化>17%预测再连接的灵敏度为 84.6%,特异性为 66.7%。
消融可降低 PV 收缩。PV 收缩测量可能为消融后检测 PV 隔离提供一种非侵入性方法。