Department of Rheumatology, Ghent University, De Pintelaan 185, Ghent, 9000, Belgium.
Arthritis Res Ther. 2010;12(4):R160. doi: 10.1186/ar3119. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
Disease severity in collagen-induced arthritis (CIA) is commonly assessed by clinical scoring of paw swelling and histological examination of joints. Although this is an accurate approach, it is also labour-intensive and the application of less invasive and less time-consuming methods is of great interest. However, it is still unclear which of these methods represents the most discriminating measure of disease activity.
We undertook a comparative analysis in which different measurements of inflammation and tissue damage in CIA were studied on an individual mouse level. We compared the current gold standard methods - clinical scoring and histological examination - with alternative methods based on scoring of X-ray or micro-computed tomography (CT) images and investigated the significance of systemically expressed proteins, involved in CIA pathogenesis, that have potential as biomarkers.
Linear regression analysis revealed a marked association of serum matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-3 levels with all features of CIA including inflammation, cartilage destruction and bone erosions. This association was improved by combined detection of MMP-3 and anti-collagen IgG2a antibody concentrations. In addition, combined analysis of both X-ray and micro-CT images was found to be predictive for cartilage and bone damage. Most remarkably, validation analysis using an independent data set proved that variations in disease severity, induced by different therapies, could be accurately represented by predicted values based on the proposed parameters.
Our analyses revealed that clinical scoring, combined with serum MMP-3, anti-collagen IgG2a measurement and scoring of X-ray and micro-CT images, yields a comprehensive insight into the different aspects of disease activity in CIA.
胶原诱导关节炎(CIA)的疾病严重程度通常通过爪子肿胀的临床评分和关节的组织学检查来评估。尽管这是一种准确的方法,但它也很耗时,因此人们对使用侵入性较小且耗时较少的方法非常感兴趣。然而,目前仍不清楚这些方法中哪一种最能准确反映疾病活动度。
我们进行了一项比较分析,在个体小鼠水平上研究了 CIA 中不同的炎症和组织损伤测量方法。我们将当前的金标准方法——临床评分和组织学检查——与基于 X 射线或微计算机断层扫描(CT)图像评分的替代方法进行了比较,并研究了在 CIA 发病机制中具有潜在生物标志物作用的系统性表达蛋白的意义。
线性回归分析显示,血清基质金属蛋白酶(MMP)-3 水平与 CIA 的所有特征,包括炎症、软骨破坏和骨侵蚀,均有明显关联。联合检测 MMP-3 和抗胶原 IgG2a 抗体浓度可提高这种关联。此外,X 射线和微 CT 图像的联合分析可预测软骨和骨损伤。最显著的是,使用独立数据集进行的验证分析证明,不同治疗方法引起的疾病严重程度变化可以通过基于提出的参数的预测值准确地表示。
我们的分析表明,临床评分与血清 MMP-3、抗胶原 IgG2a 测量以及 X 射线和微 CT 图像评分相结合,可全面了解 CIA 中疾病活动的不同方面。