Suppr超能文献

神经认知指标预测物质依赖治疗寻求者进入随机临床试验时知情同意测验的结果。

Neurocognitive indicators predict results of an informed-consent quiz among substance-dependent treatment seekers entering a randomized clinical trial.

机构信息

Department of Psychiatry, Division of Substance Abuse, Yale University School of Medicine, 950 Campbell Avenue, 151D, West Haven, Connecticut 06516, USA.

出版信息

J Stud Alcohol Drugs. 2010 Sep;71(5):704-12. doi: 10.15288/jsad.2010.71.704.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

This study sought to determine the extent to which key aspects of a clinical trial's protocol were recalled by participants entering a clinical trial for alcohol and illicit substance-use treatment after standard informed-consent procedures, as well as to explore the possible relationships between recall, neuropsychological functioning, and substance-use outcomes.

METHOD

Before entering a randomized clinical trial testing the effectiveness of a computer-based training version of cognitive-behavioral therapy, 76 participants (55% male) meeting criteria for current substance dependence (according to the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, Fourth Edition) completed a 14-item true/false quiz that assessed their comprehension of basic information provided in the consent form.

RESULTS

Only 15% of participants correctly answered all 14 consent quiz items. The percentage of correct recall was associated with measures of intelligence (r= .29, p = .01) and attention (r = -.26, p = .04). Quiz scores were also moderately associated with the amount of substance use during the treatment period (r = -.26, p = .03).

CONCLUSIONS

These findings highlight the importance of formally evaluating research participants' understanding of the informed-consent process, and they call to attention the potential utility of a brief neuropsychological screening to identify individuals in need of enhanced consent procedures, particularly within vulnerable populations, such as substance users.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定参与者在经过标准知情同意程序后参加酒精和非法药物使用治疗的临床试验时,对临床试验方案的关键方面的回忆程度,并探讨回忆、神经心理功能与药物使用结果之间的可能关系。

方法

在参加一项测试计算机化认知行为疗法的有效性的随机临床试验之前,76 名符合当前物质依赖标准(根据《精神障碍诊断与统计手册》第四版)的参与者(55%为男性)完成了一个 14 项的真/假测验,评估他们对同意书中提供的基本信息的理解。

结果

只有 15%的参与者正确回答了 14 个同意测验项目。正确回忆的百分比与智力(r =.29,p =.01)和注意力(r = -.26,p =.04)测量结果相关。测验分数也与治疗期间药物使用量中度相关(r = -.26,p =.03)。

结论

这些发现强调了正式评估研究参与者对知情同意过程的理解的重要性,同时也强调了简短神经心理筛查在识别需要增强同意程序的个体(特别是在易受影响的人群中,如药物使用者)方面的潜在效用。

相似文献

4
Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Oct;81:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
5
Effects of presentation method on the understanding of informed consent.
Br J Ophthalmol. 2006 Aug;90(8):990-3. doi: 10.1136/bjo.2006.092650. Epub 2006 May 10.
6
Interventions to Improve Patient Comprehension in Informed Consent for Medical and Surgical Procedures: An Updated Systematic Review.
Med Decis Making. 2020 Feb;40(2):119-143. doi: 10.1177/0272989X19896348. Epub 2020 Jan 16.
7
Informed consent: how much does the patient understand?
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1980 Apr;27(4):435-40. doi: 10.1038/clpt.1980.60.
8
Achieving new levels of recall in consent to research by combining remedial and motivational techniques.
J Med Ethics. 2014 Apr;40(4):264-8. doi: 10.1136/medethics-2012-101124. Epub 2013 Apr 4.
9
Are Well-Informed Potential Trial Participants More Likely to Participate?
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics. 2017 Dec;12(5):363-371. doi: 10.1177/1556264617737163. Epub 2017 Oct 26.
10
Understanding of informed consent by demented individuals.
Neurology. 2003 Dec 23;61(12):1662-6. doi: 10.1212/01.wnl.0000098933.34804.fc.

引用本文的文献

1
Extended-release vs. oral naltrexone for alcohol dependence treatment in primary care (XON).
Contemp Clin Trials. 2019 Jun;81:102-109. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2019.04.006. Epub 2019 Apr 12.
2
Assessing informed consent in an opioid relapse prevention study with adults under current or recent criminal justice supervision.
J Subst Abuse Treat. 2017 Oct;81:66-72. doi: 10.1016/j.jsat.2017.07.015. Epub 2017 Aug 1.
3
Informed Assent Recall Among Adolescents in Substance Use Disorder Treatment Research.
J Child Adolesc Subst Abuse. 2016;25(5):417-427. doi: 10.1080/1067828X.2015.1056866. Epub 2016 May 4.
4
Extended-release naltrexone opioid treatment at jail reentry (XOR).
Contemp Clin Trials. 2016 Jul;49:57-64. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2016.05.002. Epub 2016 May 10.
5
Adolescents with substance use disorder and assent/consent: Empirical data on understanding biobank risks in genomic research.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2016 Feb 1;159:267-71. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2015.12.006. Epub 2015 Dec 21.
6

本文引用的文献

1
Impulsivity as a determinant and consequence of drug use: a review of underlying processes.
Addict Biol. 2009 Jan;14(1):22-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1369-1600.2008.00129.x. Epub 2008 Oct 9.
3
Computer-assisted delivery of cognitive-behavioral therapy for addiction: a randomized trial of CBT4CBT.
Am J Psychiatry. 2008 Jul;165(7):881-8. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2008.07111835. Epub 2008 May 1.
4
The neuropsychology of amphetamine and opiate dependence: implications for treatment.
Neuropsychol Rev. 2007 Sep;17(3):317-36. doi: 10.1007/s11065-007-9033-y. Epub 2007 Aug 10.
5
Normative data and a short form of the Barratt Impulsiveness Scale.
Int J Neurosci. 2007 Mar;117(3):359-68. doi: 10.1080/00207450600588881.
6
To do or not to do? The complexities of addiction, motivation, self-control, and impulsivity.
Am J Psychiatry. 2007 Jan;164(1):4-6. doi: 10.1176/ajp.2007.164.1.4.
7
Behavioral impulsivity predicts treatment outcome in a smoking cessation program for adolescent smokers.
Drug Alcohol Depend. 2007 Apr 17;88(1):79-82. doi: 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2006.09.006. Epub 2006 Oct 17.
9
Profile of executive and memory function associated with amphetamine and opiate dependence.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2006 May;31(5):1036-47. doi: 10.1038/sj.npp.1300889.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验