Department of Chemistry, Nankai University, Tianjin, 300071, PR China.
Phys Chem Chem Phys. 2010 Oct 21;12(39):12697-701. doi: 10.1039/c0cp00549e. Epub 2010 Aug 24.
Density functional theory is now the method of choice for calculating the electronic structure of complex systems, and time-dependent density functional theory (TDDFT) is now the preferred method for calculating spectroscopic properties of large molecules. The validity of the theory depends mainly on the quality of the approximation to the unknown exchange-correlation energy. In the present paper we consider TDDFT calculations of electronic excitation energies and oscillator strengths. We show that the M06-2X and M08-HX density functionals perform as well as and better than the range-separated CAM-B3LYP functional for charge transfer excitations with intermediate spatial overlap but have better performance for bond energies, noncovalent interactions, and chemical reaction barrier heights for representative systems; we conclude that M06-2X and M08-HX should be preferred for studies requiring the exploration of potential energy surfaces as well as electronic excitation energies, provided that those excitations with the longest-range charge transfer are excluded.
密度泛函理论现在是计算复杂体系电子结构的首选方法,而含时密度泛函理论(TDDFT)现在是计算大分子光谱性质的首选方法。该理论的有效性主要取决于对未知交换关联能量的近似质量。在本文中,我们考虑了电子激发能和振子强度的 TDDFT 计算。我们表明,M06-2X 和 M08-HX 密度泛函在中等空间重叠的电荷转移激发方面的性能与范围分离的 CAM-B3LYP 泛函一样好,甚至更好,但对于代表性体系的键能、非共价相互作用和化学反应势垒高度的性能更好;我们得出结论,对于需要探索势能面以及电子激发能的研究,M06-2X 和 M08-HX 应该是首选的,前提是排除那些具有最长距离电荷转移的激发。