Marymount University, USA.
J Clin Psychol. 2010 Dec;66(12):1254-80. doi: 10.1002/jclp.20722. Epub 2010 Aug 23.
This review provides a critical analysis of the ability of multiscale inventories to distinguish between sex offender and nonoffender control groups, as well as to discriminate sex offenders from other types of offenders. In addition to expanding upon previous reviews that examined the utility of the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI) with this population (e.g., Levin & Stava, 1987), the current review included studies that utilized other multiscale inventories commonly used in forensic practice (i.e., MMPI-2, Millon Clinical Multiaxial Inventory-III [MCMI-III], Personality Assessment Inventory) and, when possible, provides effect sizes to evaluate group differences. Based on the review, the various forms of the MMPI and MCMI are clearly the most widely used instruments in sex offender populations. The MMPI Pd scale has shown moderate to large effect sizes when distinguishing between sex offender and nonsex offender groups, but this relationship may be reflective of antisocial behavior in general rather than traits specific to sex offenders. Recommendations to standardize future research classification strategies and more effectively utilize these instruments when assessing sex offenders are also provided.
这篇综述批判性地分析了多尺度清单在区分性犯罪者和非犯罪者对照组,以及在将性犯罪者与其他类型的罪犯区分开来的能力。除了扩展之前检查明尼苏达多相人格问卷(MMPI)在该人群中的效用的综述(例如,Levin 和 Stava,1987)之外,本综述还包括了使用其他在法医实践中常用的多尺度清单的研究(即,MMPI-2,Millon 临床多轴人格问卷-III [MCMI-III],人格评估清单),并在可能的情况下提供了评估组间差异的效应大小。基于综述,MMPI 和 MCMI 的各种形式显然是性犯罪者人群中使用最广泛的工具。MMPI Pd 量表在区分性犯罪者和非性犯罪者群体方面显示出中等至较大的效应大小,但这种关系可能反映了一般的反社会行为,而不是特定于性犯罪者的特征。还提供了建议,以标准化未来的研究分类策略,并在评估性犯罪者时更有效地利用这些工具。