Suppr超能文献

创伤性脑损伤(TBI)后意识障碍与损伤严重程度、执行功能和内隐功能的关系。

The contribution of injury severity, executive and implicit functions to awareness of deficits after traumatic brain injury (TBI).

机构信息

Neurorehabilitation Services Tickhill Road Hospital, Doncaster, South Yorkshire, UK.

出版信息

J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2010 Nov;16(6):1089-98. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710000925. Epub 2010 Aug 25.

Abstract

Deficits in self-awareness are commonly seen after Traumatic Brain Injury (TBI) and adversely affect rehabilitative efforts, independence and quality of life (Ponsford, 2004). Awareness models predict that executive and implicit functions are important cognitive components of awareness though the putative relationship between implicit and awareness processes has not been subject to empirical investigation (Crosson et al., 1989; Ownsworth, Clare, & Morris, 2006; Toglia & Kirk, 2000). Severity of injury, also thought to be a crucial determinant of awareness outcome post-insult, is under-explored in awareness studies (Sherer, Boake, Levin, Silver, Ringholz, & Walter, 1998). The present study measured the contribution of injury severity, IQ, mood state, executive and implicit functions to awareness in head-injured patients assigned to moderate/severe head-injured groups using several awareness, executive, and implicit measures. Severe injuries resulted in greater impairments across most awareness, executive and implicit measures compared with moderate injuries, although deficits were still seen in the moderate group. Hierarchical regression results showed that severity of injury, IQ, mood state, executive and implicit functions made significant unique contributions to selective aspects of awareness. Future models of awareness should account for both implicit and executive contributions to awareness and the possibility that both are vulnerable to disruption after neuropathology.

摘要

创伤性脑损伤 (TBI) 后常出现自我意识缺陷,这会对康复治疗、独立性和生活质量产生不利影响 (Ponsford, 2004)。意识模型预测,执行功能和内隐功能是意识的重要认知成分,尽管内隐和意识过程之间的假定关系尚未经过实证研究 (Crosson 等人,1989 年;Ownsworth 等人,2006 年;Toglia 和 Kirk,2000 年)。损伤严重程度也被认为是损伤后意识结果的关键决定因素,但在意识研究中探索不足 (Sherer 等人,1998 年)。本研究使用几种意识、执行和内隐测量方法,测量了损伤严重程度、智商、情绪状态、执行和内隐功能对中重度颅脑损伤患者意识的贡献。与中度损伤相比,严重损伤导致大多数意识、执行和内隐测量的损伤更大,但在中度损伤组中仍存在缺陷。层次回归结果表明,损伤严重程度、智商、情绪状态、执行和内隐功能对意识的选择性方面有显著的独特贡献。未来的意识模型应考虑内隐和执行对意识的贡献,以及两者在神经病理学后都可能受到破坏的可能性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验