Nelson Mark, Fisher Martin, Gonzalez-Garcia Juan, Rockstroh Jürgen K, Weinstein David, Valdez Hernan, Mayer Howard, van der Ryst Elna, Goodrich James M, Dang Nathalie
Chelsea and Westminster Hospital, London, UK.
HIV Clin Trials. 2010 May-Jun;11(3):145-55. doi: 10.1310/hct1103-145.
The MOTIVATE studies assessed maraviroc with optimized background therapy (OBT) in treatment-experienced patients with R5 HIV-1. This post hoc analysis compared outcomes between patients with and without HIV-1 resistance to epsilon3 classes of antiretrovirals at screening (triple-class-resistant [TCR] versus not-TCR [nTCR]).
Week 48 changes (N = 635) in HIV-1 RNA and CD4+ cells were compared between TCR and nTCR groups receiving twice-daily maraviroc+OBT or placebo+OBT.
HIV-1 RNA change from baseline on maraviroc was significantly greater in the nTCR group (-2.05 vs -1.74 log(10) copies/mL; 95% CI difference 0.05-0.58 log(10)) though proportions <400 or <50 copies/mL were not. Week 48 CD4 increases were significantly greater in the nTCR group overall (mean +150 vs +110 cells/mm(3); 95% CI difference 18-62 cells/mm(3)) and in those with <50 RNA copies/mL (nTCR +192 vs +126 cells/mm(3); 95% CI difference, 19-93 cells/mm(3)) or receiving > or = 2 active OBT agents (weighted score; nTCR +184 vs +125 cells/mm3; 95% CI difference 8-110 cells/mm(3)).
Virologic suppression on maraviroc was greater in the nTCR than the TCR group, though proportions <50 or 400 copies/mL were not significantly different. Optimal CD4 increases on maraviroc appeared to accrue from initiation before development of TCR virus.
MOTIVATE研究评估了马拉维若联合优化背景治疗(OBT)方案在有R5型HIV-1感染治疗史患者中的疗效。这项事后分析比较了筛查时对三类抗逆转录病毒药物有或无HIV-1耐药性的患者(三重耐药[TCR]与非三重耐药[nTCR])的治疗结果。
比较了接受每日两次马拉维若+OBT或安慰剂+OBT的TCR组和nTCR组在第48周时HIV-1 RNA和CD4+细胞的变化(N = 635)。
nTCR组中,马拉维若治疗后HIV-1 RNA较基线的变化显著更大(-2.05对-1.74 log₁₀拷贝/毫升;95%CI差异0.05 - 0.58 log₁₀),但<400或<50拷贝/毫升的比例无差异。总体上,nTCR组在第48周时CD4增加显著更大(平均+150对+110细胞/立方毫米;95%CI差异18 - 62细胞/立方毫米),在HIV-1 RNA<50拷贝/毫升的患者中也是如此(nTCR +192对+126细胞/立方毫米;95%CI差异19 - 9³细胞/立方毫米),或在接受≥2种活性OBT药物的患者中(加权评分;nTCR +184对+125细胞/立方毫米;95%CI差异8 - 110细胞/立方毫米)。
nTCR组中马拉维若的病毒学抑制作用大于TCR组,不过<50或400拷贝/毫升的比例无显著差异。马拉维若治疗时最佳的CD4增加似乎源于在TCR病毒出现之前开始治疗。