Suppr超能文献

内科医生关于慢性鼻-鼻窦炎的文献:已发表信息的数量与质量评估

The internist's literature on chronic rhinosinusitis: an evaluation of the amount and quality of published information.

作者信息

Chester Alexander C

机构信息

Department of Medicine, Georgetown University Hospital, Washington, DC, USA.

出版信息

Ear Nose Throat J. 2010 Aug;89(8):E7-11. doi: 10.1177/014556131008900802.

Abstract

Most patients with chronic rhinosinusitis (CRS) are treated by internists, yet the information available to internists about CRS is rarely assessed. The author undertook a study to evaluate the amount and quality of information about CRS that is available to internists. Four information sources were analyzed: (1) five journals routinely read by internists, published over a 10-year period and searched on PubMed for the "exploded" terms chronic and sinusitis; (2) seven representative general and outpatient medicine texts, searched on MD Consult and STAT!Ref; (3) the 14th edition of the Medical Knowledge Self-Assessment Program (MKSAP 14), a review of internal medicine; and (4) four commonly used Internet databases. The five journals contained a total of 37,250 cited articles of various types over the study period; CRS was mentioned in only 19 of them. The standard medical texts offered little information about CRS, and MKSAP 14 did not mention CRS at all in the text, although it included some information in the questions and answers. Finally, among the online sources, UpToDate, a proprietary Internet database, offered an excellent discourse on CRS; in contrast, the Physicians' Information and Education Resource, maintained by the American College of Physicians, contained no information about CRS in its 436 subject modules. The author concludes that, with few exceptions, the literature routinely available to internists offers little information about CRS.

摘要

大多数慢性鼻-鼻窦炎(CRS)患者由内科医生治疗,但内科医生可获取的有关CRS的信息很少得到评估。作者开展了一项研究,以评估内科医生可获取的有关CRS的信息数量和质量。分析了四个信息来源:(1)内科医生经常阅读的五本期刊,这些期刊在10年期间出版,并在PubMed上搜索“慢性”和“鼻窦炎”这两个“扩展”术语;(2)七本有代表性的普通内科和门诊医学教材,在MD Consult和STAT!Ref上进行搜索;(3)《医学知识自我评估计划》(MKSAP 14)第14版,一本内科综述;以及(4)四个常用的互联网数据库。在研究期间,这五本期刊共包含37250篇各类被引用文章;其中仅有19篇提到了CRS。标准医学教材提供的有关CRS的信息很少,MKSAP 14在正文里根本没有提及CRS,不过在问答部分包含了一些相关信息。最后,在在线资源中,专业互联网数据库UpToDate提供了一篇关于CRS的精彩论述;相比之下,由美国医师协会维护的《医师信息与教育资源》在其436个主题模块中没有关于CRS的信息。作者得出结论,除了少数例外情况,内科医生通常可获取的文献提供的有关CRS的信息很少。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验