• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

去贫困中心化,重塑政府:贫困治理中的社会运动与国家

Decentring poverty, reworking government: social movements and states in the government of poverty.

机构信息

Clark University, USA.

出版信息

J Dev Stud. 2010;46(7):1304-26. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.487094.

DOI:10.1080/00220388.2010.487094
PMID:20737741
Abstract

The significance of social movements for pro-poor political and social change is widely acknowledged. Poverty reduction has assumed increasing significance within development debates, discourses and programmes - how do social movement leaders and activists respond? This paper explores this question through the mapping of social movement organisations in Peru and South Africa. We conclude that for movement activists 'poverty' is rarely a central concern. Instead, they represent their actions as challenging injustice, inequality and/or development models with which they disagree, and reject the simplifying and sectoral orientation of poverty reduction interventions. In today's engagement with the poverty-reducing state, their challenge is to secure resources and influence without becoming themselves subject to, or even the subjects of, the practices of government.

摘要

社会运动对于促进有利于穷人的政治和社会变革具有重要意义,这一点已得到广泛认可。减贫在发展辩论、讨论和方案中变得越来越重要——社会运动的领导者和积极分子如何应对?本文通过对秘鲁和南非的社会运动组织进行分析,探讨了这一问题。我们的结论是,对于运动积极分子来说,“贫困”很少是他们关注的核心问题。相反,他们将自己的行动描述为挑战不公正、不平等和/或他们不同意的发展模式,并拒绝简化和针对减贫干预措施的部门性。在今天与减贫国家的接触中,他们的挑战是在不使自己受制于政府行为,甚至成为政府行为的主体的情况下,争取资源和影响力。

相似文献

1
Decentring poverty, reworking government: social movements and states in the government of poverty.去贫困中心化,重塑政府:贫困治理中的社会运动与国家
J Dev Stud. 2010;46(7):1304-26. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.487094.
2
The government of chronic poverty: from exclusion to citizenship?慢性贫困的政府:从排斥到公民身份?
J Dev Stud. 2010;46(7):1139-55. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.487100.
3
Government's anti-poverty measures in Punjab: a political analysis.旁遮普邦政府的扶贫措施:一项政治分析。
Punjab J Polit. 2002;26(1):45-69.
4
School exclusion as social exclusion: the practices and effects of a conditional cash transfer programme for the poor in Bangladesh.学校排斥等同于社会排斥:孟加拉国针对贫困人群的有条件现金转移支付计划的实践与影响。
J Dev Stud. 2010;46(7):1264-82. doi: 10.1080/00220388.2010.487096.
5
[Poor relief in the Ottoman Empire, 1839-1918].[奥斯曼帝国的贫困救济,1839 - 1918年]
Toplum Bilim. 1999(83):111-32.
6
[Diaconate as official poor relief? Part 2: questions from Friesland].[执事会作为官方的贫困救济?第二部分:来自弗里斯兰省的问题]
Ned Arch Kerkgeschied. 2001;81(2):168-84.
7
The "liberal state": civil society and social welfare in nineteenth-century England.“自由国家”:19世纪英国的公民社会与社会福利
J Hist Sociol. 2002;15(1):114-9. doi: 10.1111/1467-6443.00173.
8
[The evolution of the British welfare system and its regulatory function].[英国福利制度的演变及其监管功能]
Shi Jie Li Shi. 1999(4):40-8.
9
Reducing child poverty in Britain: an assessment of government policy, 1997-2001.减少英国儿童贫困:1997 - 2001年政府政策评估
Econ J (London). 2001;111(469):F85-F101. doi: 10.1111/1468-0297.00600.
10
Voluntary charity in early nineteenth-century Ulster: counties Armagh and Down in the 1830s.19世纪早期阿尔斯特的志愿慈善事业:19世纪30年代的阿马郡和唐郡。
Local Hist. 2001;31(4):204-20.