Department of Psychology, The Ohio State University, 331 Ovalwood Hall, 1961 University Drive, Mansfield, OH 44906, USA.
J Dent Res. 2010 Nov;89(11):1254-8. doi: 10.1177/0022034510376772. Epub 2010 Aug 25.
Although a large body of scientific literature shows that background color and luminance affect color perception, previous measurements of tooth color difference thresholds have not taken the effects of viewing context into account. The present study tested the hypothesis that differences in skin/gingival color influence individuals' judgments of tooth color differences. Perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were determined in 10 individuals using a signal detection paradigm. They evaluated 500 pseudo-random presentations of two facial portraits: an African-American and a Caucasian. These portraits varied trial-to-trial only in the direction (CIELAB +L*, +a*, or +b*) or magnitude of the color difference between a portrait's two central incisors. The individuals were significantly less sensitive to tooth color differences in the +L* direction in the Caucasian portrait than for any other combination of color direction or portrait type. Furthermore, comparable perceptibility and acceptability thresholds were generally not statistically significant from each other.
尽管大量科学文献表明背景颜色和亮度会影响颜色感知,但之前对牙齿颜色差异阈值的测量并未考虑到观察环境的影响。本研究检验了这样一个假设,即肤色/牙龈颜色的差异会影响个体对牙齿颜色差异的判断。在 10 名个体中使用信号检测范式确定了可感知性和可接受性阈值。他们评估了 500 次两个面部肖像的伪随机呈现:一个非裔美国人,一个白种人。这些肖像在每一次试验中只在两个中央门牙之间的颜色差异方向(CIELAB+L*、+a或+b)或大小上有所变化。与其他任何颜色方向或肖像类型的组合相比,个体在白种人肖像中对 L*方向上的牙齿颜色差异的敏感度明显较低。此外,可感知性和可接受性阈值通常彼此之间没有统计学上的显著差异。