Kasahara E, Yasuda E, Yamamoto A, Anzai M
Department of Conservative Dentistry, Matsumoto Dental College, Shiojiri, Nagano, Japan.
J Endod. 1990 Apr;16(4):158-61. doi: 10.1016/S0099-2399(06)81962-X.
To better assess the efficacy of mechanical preparation of root canals, transparent specimens of 510 extracted maxillary central incisors were investigated for thickness and curvature of the root canal, condition of any accessory canals, and location of the apical foramen. Over 60% of the specimens showed accessory canals that are impossible to clean mechanically. Most lateral branches were small, 80% were the size of a #10 reamer or less, and only 3% were thicker than a #40 reamer. Apical foramina located away from the apex were observed in 45% of the teeth, although nearly 80% of all foramina were within approximately 0.5 mm of the apex, and 95% were within approximately 1.0 mm. Data on the thickness and curvature of the main canal showed that normally it is adequately prepared when reached with a #60 reamer to the apical constriction and supplemented by flare preparation.
为了更好地评估根管机械预备的效果,对510颗拔除的上颌中切牙透明标本进行了研究,以观察根管的厚度和弯曲度、任何副根管的情况以及根尖孔的位置。超过60%的标本显示存在无法通过机械方法清理的副根管。大多数侧支较小,80%的侧支直径为10号扩孔钻或更小,只有3%的侧支直径大于40号扩孔钻。45%的牙齿观察到根尖孔远离根尖,尽管几乎80%的根尖孔位于根尖约0.5毫米范围内,95%位于约1.0毫米范围内。关于主根管厚度和弯曲度的数据表明,通常使用60号扩孔钻到达根尖狭窄处并辅以扩锥预备时,根管能得到充分预备。