• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

[骨髓增生异常综合征。27例临床生物学分析]

[Myelodysplastic syndromes. A clinico-biological analysis of 27 cases].

作者信息

Mereuţă A, Turtureanu-Hanganu E

机构信息

Clinica a III-a medicală, Institutul de Medicină şi Farmacie Iaşi.

出版信息

Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1990 Jan-Mar;94(1):67-73.

PMID:2075337
Abstract

A series of 27 patients with myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS) was analysed to determine the clinical and pathologic features, the natural history and the prognostic factors. The clinical features of these patients included the following: mean age 53.77 years; symptoms due to cytopenias 100 per cent; hepatomegaly 44.5 per cent; splenomegaly 11 per cent. Almost all patients with MDS presented anemia; additional cytopenias were present in many patients. The bone marrow was hypocellular in 1/3 of cases. The patients have been classified according to the French-American-British (FAB) Group criteria: there were 11 patients with refractory anemia, 11 patients with refractory anemia with sideroblasts and 5 patients with refractory anemia with excess of blasts. The mean survival was 19 months, 9 patients died: death was due to infection or hemorrhage in 7 cases and to evolution to acute myelogenous leukemia (AML) in 2 cases (10.5%). Thrombocytopenia, the Bournemouth scoring system and FAB classification were independent prognostic factors.

摘要

对27例骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)患者进行了分析,以确定其临床和病理特征、自然病史及预后因素。这些患者的临床特征如下:平均年龄53.77岁;100%的患者有血细胞减少相关症状;44.5%的患者有肝肿大;11%的患者有脾肿大。几乎所有MDS患者都有贫血;许多患者还存在其他血细胞减少。1/3的病例骨髓细胞减少。根据法国-美国-英国(FAB)组标准对患者进行了分类:11例难治性贫血患者,11例伴有环形铁粒幼细胞的难治性贫血患者,5例伴有原始细胞增多的难治性贫血患者。平均生存期为19个月,9例患者死亡:7例死于感染或出血,2例(10.5%)死于进展为急性髓系白血病(AML)。血小板减少、伯恩茅斯评分系统和FAB分类是独立的预后因素。

相似文献

1
[Myelodysplastic syndromes. A clinico-biological analysis of 27 cases].[骨髓增生异常综合征。27例临床生物学分析]
Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi. 1990 Jan-Mar;94(1):67-73.
2
Myelodysplastic syndromes: a community hospital-based study of prognostic factors and International Prognostic Scoring System.骨髓增生异常综合征:一项基于社区医院的预后因素及国际预后评分系统研究
Conn Med. 2001 Aug;65(8):455-63.
3
Detection of risk groups in myelodysplastic syndromes. A multicenter study.骨髓增生异常综合征风险组的检测。一项多中心研究。
Haematologica. 2002 Jan;87(1):9-16.
4
A comparative review of classification systems in myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS).骨髓增生异常综合征(MDS)分类系统的比较综述。
Semin Oncol. 2005 Aug;32(4 Suppl 5):S3-10. doi: 10.1053/j.seminoncol.2005.06.021.
5
Factors influencing survival in myelodysplastic syndromes in a Brazilian population: comparison of FAB and WHO classifications.影响巴西人群骨髓增生异常综合征生存的因素:FAB与WHO分类的比较
Leuk Res. 2004 Jun;28(6):587-94. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2003.11.001.
6
The myelodysplastic syndromes: classification and prognosis.骨髓增生异常综合征:分类与预后
Curr Hematol Rep. 2003 May;2(3):179-85.
7
Circulating myeloid colony-forming cells predict survival in myelodysplastic syndromes.循环髓系集落形成细胞可预测骨髓增生异常综合征的生存率。
Ann Hematol. 2003 May;82(5):271-7. doi: 10.1007/s00277-003-0619-z. Epub 2003 Mar 22.
8
Comparison of five prognostic scoring systems, the French-American-British (FAB) and World Health Organization (WHO) classifications in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes: Results of a single-center analysis.五种预后评分系统、法国-美国-英国(FAB)分类法和世界卫生组织(WHO)分类法在骨髓增生异常综合征患者中的比较:一项单中心分析结果
Ann Hematol. 2006 Aug;85(8):502-13. doi: 10.1007/s00277-005-0030-z. Epub 2006 May 20.
9
Classification and scoring systems in myelodysplastic syndromes: a retrospective analysis of 311 patients.骨髓增生异常综合征的分类和评分系统:311例患者的回顾性分析
Leuk Res. 2006 Aug;30(8):971-7. doi: 10.1016/j.leukres.2005.11.015. Epub 2006 Jan 19.
10
Prospective validation of the WHO proposals for the classification of myelodysplastic syndromes.世界卫生组织关于骨髓增生异常综合征分类提议的前瞻性验证
Haematologica. 2006 Dec;91(12):1596-604.