• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

kappa与优势比的衰减

Kappa and attenuation of the odds ratio.

作者信息

Thompson W D

机构信息

Department of Applied Medical Sciences, University of Southern Maines, Portland 04103.

出版信息

Epidemiology. 1990 Sep;1(5):357-69. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199009000-00005.

DOI:10.1097/00001648-199009000-00005
PMID:2078611
Abstract

This paper explores the relation between reliability and validity for binary variables. An equation is first derived for expressing the kappa coefficient of reliability as a function of true prevalence, sensitivity, specificity, and the degree of correlation of errors within true positives and within true negatives. It is then shown that under certain circumstances kappa is closely related to an index of the validity of the odds ratio as a means for quantifying an association between an imperfectly classified binary factor and membership in two subpopulations. This index is defined as the ratio of the observed odds ratio minus one to the true odds ratio minus one. Numerical results indicate that, when error rates are high, kappa can be of smaller magnitude than this index of validity. When the value of kappa reflects substantial correlation of errors, however, the value of kappa typically exceeds that of the index of validity. Correlated errors among the true negatives are found to affect the correspondence between kappa and the index of validity rather differently than do correlated errors among the true positives. Although kappa often exceeds the index of validity, use of kappa to correct the odds ratio for attenuation owing to nondifferential misclassification generally leads to undercorrection rather than overcorrection. Consequently, the relation between kappa and the index of the validity of the odds ratio may have practical value for reducing bias in the estimation of exposure-disease associations in epidemiologic research.

摘要

本文探讨二元变量的可靠性与有效性之间的关系。首先推导了一个方程,用于将可靠性的kappa系数表示为真实患病率、敏感性、特异性以及真阳性和真阴性内部误差相关程度的函数。然后表明,在某些情况下,kappa与作为量化不完全分类二元因素与两个亚人群成员资格之间关联的一种手段的优势比有效性指数密切相关。该指数定义为观察到的优势比减1与真实优势比减1的比值。数值结果表明,当错误率较高时,kappa可能比该有效性指数的数值小。然而,当kappa值反映出误差的显著相关性时,kappa值通常超过有效性指数的值。发现真阴性之间的相关误差对kappa与有效性指数之间对应关系的影响与真阳性之间的相关误差有很大不同。尽管kappa常常超过有效性指数,但使用kappa来校正因非差异性错误分类导致的优势比衰减通常会导致校正不足而非校正过度。因此,kappa与优势比有效性指数之间的关系对于减少流行病学研究中暴露-疾病关联估计的偏差可能具有实际价值。

相似文献

1
Kappa and attenuation of the odds ratio.kappa与优势比的衰减
Epidemiology. 1990 Sep;1(5):357-69. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199009000-00005.
2
A reappraisal of the kappa coefficient.对kappa系数的重新评估。
J Clin Epidemiol. 1988;41(10):949-58. doi: 10.1016/0895-4356(88)90031-5.
3
Measurement error in biomarkers: sources, assessment, and impact on studies.生物标志物中的测量误差:来源、评估及其对研究的影响。
IARC Sci Publ. 2011(163):143-61.
4
Use and limitations of dual measurements in correcting for nondifferential exposure misclassification.双重测量在纠正无差异暴露错误分类中的应用及局限性。
Epidemiology. 1992 May;3(3):216-22. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199205000-00006.
5
When measurement errors correlate with truth: surprising effects of nondifferential misclassification.当测量误差与真值相关时:无差异错误分类的惊人影响。
Epidemiology. 1995 Mar;6(2):157-61. doi: 10.1097/00001648-199503000-00012.
6
[Study on the impact of exposure misclassification on the validity of a study].暴露错分对研究效度影响的研究
Zhonghua Liu Xing Bing Xue Za Zhi. 2005 Nov;26(11):919-23.
7
How independent are multiple 'independent' diagnostic classifications?多个“独立的”诊断分类的独立性如何?
Stat Med. 1996 Jul 15;15(13):1377-86. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19960715)15:13<1377::AID-SIM275>3.0.CO;2-#.
8
Design and interpretation of studies of differential exposure measurement error.差异暴露测量误差研究的设计与解读
Am J Epidemiol. 2003 Mar 1;157(5):380-7. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwf203.
9
Misclassification bias arising from random error in exposure measurement: implications for dual measurement strategies.暴露测量中的随机误差导致的错误分类偏差:对双重测量策略的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1993 Sep 15;138(6):453-61. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a116877.
10
The effect on the stratum-specific odds ratios of nondifferential misclassification of a dichotomous covariate.二分协变量非差异错误分类对特定分层比值比的影响。
Am J Epidemiol. 1991 Jan 15;133(2):202-7. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115858.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of Clinical, Maternal, and Self Pubertal Assessments: Implications for Health Studies.临床、母体及自我青春期评估的比较:对健康研究的启示
Pediatrics. 2016 Jul;138(1). doi: 10.1542/peds.2015-4571. Epub 2016 Jun 8.
2
Log-Linear Modeling of Agreement among Expert Exposure Assessors.专家暴露评估者之间一致性的对数线性模型
Ann Occup Hyg. 2015 Jul;59(6):764-74. doi: 10.1093/annhyg/mev011. Epub 2015 Mar 6.
3
Basic problems in interaction assessment.交互评估中的基本问题。
Environ Health Perspect. 1993 Dec;101 Suppl 4(Suppl 4):59-66. doi: 10.1289/ehp.93101s459.