Suppr超能文献

人体或其视觉环境进行超低频全身振动时听觉诱发电位的变化。

Changes in auditory evoked brain potentials during ultra-low frequency whole-body vibration of man or of his visual surround.

作者信息

Seidel H, Schuster U, Menzel G, Nikolajewitsch Kurerov N, Richter J, Schajpak E J, Blüthner R, Meister A, Ullsperger P

机构信息

Department of Occupational Hygiene, Central Institute for Occupational Medicine of the German Democratic Republic, Berlin.

出版信息

Eur J Appl Physiol Occup Physiol. 1990;61(5-6):356-61. doi: 10.1007/BF00236053.

Abstract

Auditory evoked brain potentials (AEP) were recorded from nine healthy male subjects during three types of condition: A - subject and visual field stationary; B - subject vibrated (z-axis, 0.6 Hz, 1.85 ms-2 rms), visual field stationary; C - subject stationary, visual field vibrated (as for B). The visual surround was confined to a checkerboard pattern in front of the subject. Auditory stimuli (1000 Hz, 86 dB, interstimulus interval 7 s) were delivered via headphones to evoke AEP. Vibration-synchronous activity in the EEG was eliminated by a subtraction technique. In comparison with condition A, conditions B and C caused an attenuation of P2 and N1P2 components of AEP together with an increased latency of N1. Effects of conditions B and C did not differ. Direct vestibular stimulation and mechanisms specific for whole-body vibration were rejected as modes of action. The AEP-changes and the subjective evaluation of experimental conditions, arousal and performance, as well as symptoms of kinetosis (motion sickness) suggest a sensory mismatch, leading to a "latent kinetosis" with de-arousal, as the dominating mechanism by which the processing of information was affected. This suggestion was supported by an additional pilot study. Under real working conditions a similar effect can be expected during relative motion between the driver and his visual surround, i.e. even with perfect vibro-isolation of the driver's seat.

摘要

在三种情况下记录了9名健康男性受试者的听觉诱发电位(AEP):A - 受试者和视野静止;B - 受试者振动(z轴,0.6Hz,1.85ms-2均方根),视野静止;C - 受试者静止,视野振动(与B相同)。视觉环绕局限于受试者前方的棋盘图案。通过耳机施加听觉刺激(1000Hz,86dB,刺激间隔7s)以诱发AEP。通过减法技术消除脑电图中的振动同步活动。与情况A相比,情况B和C导致AEP的P2和N1P2成分衰减,同时N1潜伏期增加。情况B和C的效果没有差异。直接前庭刺激和全身振动特有的机制被排除为作用方式。AEP变化以及对实验条件、唤醒和表现的主观评估,以及晕动病(运动病)症状表明存在感觉不匹配,导致伴有唤醒降低的“潜在晕动病”,这是影响信息处理的主要机制。这一建议得到了一项额外的初步研究的支持。在实际工作条件下,预计在驾驶员与其视觉环绕之间的相对运动期间会出现类似效果,即即使驾驶员座椅具有完美的隔振。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验