Brunel University, Physiotherapy, Centre for Research in Rehabilitation, Uxbridge, UK.
J Interprof Care. 2011 Mar;25(2):91-7. doi: 10.3109/13561820.2010.483024. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
Much emphasis is placed on expert knowledge like evidence-based stroke guidelines, with insufficient attention paid to processes required to translate this into delivery of everyday good care. This paper highlights the worth of creating a Community of Practice (CoP) as a means to achieve this. Drawing on findings from a study conducted in 2000-2002 of processes involved in establishing a nationally lauded high quality Stroke Unit, it demonstrates how successful development of a new service was linked to creation of a CoP. Recent literature suggests CoPs have a key in implementing evidence-based practice; this study supports this claim whilst revealing for the first time the practical knowledge and skills required to develop this style of working. Findings indicate that participatory and democratic characteristics of Action Research are congruent with the collaborative approach required for developing a CoP. The study is an exemplar of how practitioner researchers can capture learning from changing practice, thus contributing to evidence-based healthcare with theoretical and practical knowledge. Findings are relevant to those developing stroke services globally but also to those interested in evidence-based practice.
非常重视专家知识,如基于证据的中风指南,但对将其转化为日常良好护理所需的过程关注不足。本文强调创建实践社区(CoP)的价值,以此作为实现这一目标的手段。本文利用 2000-2002 年对建立全国知名高质量中风单元所涉及的过程进行的研究结果,展示了如何成功地开发新服务与创建 CoP 相关联。最近的文献表明,实践社区在实施基于证据的实践方面具有关键作用;这项研究支持了这一说法,同时首次揭示了开发这种工作方式所需的实际知识和技能。研究结果表明,行动研究的参与式和民主特征与开发实践社区所需的协作方法是一致的。该研究是从业者研究人员如何从不断变化的实践中获取学习的范例,从而为循证医疗保健提供理论和实践知识。研究结果不仅与全球范围内开发中风服务的人员有关,而且与对循证实践感兴趣的人员有关。