• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

警惕危险:对空间上可预测的威胁刺激的注意偏向。

Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli.

机构信息

Department of Experimental-Clinical and Health Psychology, Ghent University, Belgium.

出版信息

Behav Res Ther. 2010 Nov;48(11):1150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 5.

DOI:10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.013
PMID:20797698
Abstract

Attentional bias to threat is well established, however, the influence of spatial predictability on this attentional bias has never been investigated. Here we investigated how threat affects attentional capture and disengagement when its spatial location is predictable. Using a visual search paradigm, participants were required to identify a target inside one of a variable number of colored circles. One color (Conditioned Stimulus, CS+) was fear-conditioned using an electrocutaneous stimulus at tolerance level. In the experimental group the CS+ was made spatially predictable (occurred more often at one location in the visual display), while this was not the case in the control group. Results showed no complete automatic capture of attention by the CS+, but the experimental group did show more prioritization of the CS+ and less difficulty to disengage from the CS+ than the control group. Of further importance was the finding that the experimental group also attended to the location that was predictive of the CS+, even when no CS+ was presented. Findings are discussed in terms the effects of predictability on anxiety.

摘要

注意偏向于威胁是既定的,然而,空间可预测性对这种注意偏向的影响从未被研究过。在这里,我们研究了当威胁的空间位置可预测时,它如何影响注意力的捕获和脱离。使用视觉搜索范式,要求参与者在可变数量的彩色圆圈中识别一个目标。一种颜色(条件刺激,CS+)通过在耐受水平的电刺激进行恐惧条件反射。在实验组中,CS+的空间是可预测的(在视觉显示的一个位置出现的频率更高),而对照组则不是这样。结果表明,CS+并没有完全自动地吸引注意力,但实验组确实比对照组更优先注意 CS+,并且更难以从 CS+中脱离。更重要的是,研究结果发现,即使没有 CS+出现,实验组也会注意到可预测 CS+的位置。研究结果从可预测性对焦虑的影响方面进行了讨论。

相似文献

1
Looking out for danger: An attentional bias towards spatially predictable threatening stimuli.警惕危险:对空间上可预测的威胁刺激的注意偏向。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Nov;48(11):1150-4. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.07.013. Epub 2010 Aug 5.
2
The role of extinction and reinstatement in attentional bias to threat: a conditioning approach.消退和恢复在对威胁的注意偏向中的作用:一种条件作用方法。
Behav Res Ther. 2006 Nov;44(11):1555-63. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2005.11.008. Epub 2005 Dec 22.
3
Processing efficiency in anxiety: Evidence from eye-movements during visual search.焦虑症的加工效率:来自视觉搜索过程中眼动的证据。
Behav Res Ther. 2010 Dec;48(12):1180-5. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2010.08.009. Epub 2010 Sep 6.
4
The effect of visual threat on spatial attention to touch.视觉威胁对触觉空间注意力的影响。
Cognition. 2007 Mar;102(3):405-14. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2006.01.006. Epub 2006 Feb 28.
5
Difficulty of discrimination modulates attentional capture by regulating attentional focus.辨别难度通过调节注意力焦点来调节注意力捕获。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2009 Feb;21(2):359-71. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.21022.
6
Attentional prioritisation of threatening information: examining the role of the size of the attentional window.注意资源对威胁信息的优先分配:考察注意窗口大小的作用。
Cogn Emot. 2013;27(4):621-31. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2012.730036. Epub 2012 Oct 12.
7
Conditioning-induced attentional bias for face stimuli measured with the emotional Stroop task.用情绪Stroop任务测量的条件作用诱导的对面部刺激的注意偏向。
Emotion. 2009 Feb;9(1):134-9. doi: 10.1037/a0014590.
8
Attentional bias to threat: a perceptual accuracy approach.对威胁的注意偏向:一种知觉准确性方法。
Emotion. 2008 Dec;8(6):820-7. doi: 10.1037/a0014149.
9
Fear-conditioned cues of impending pain facilitate attentional engagement.即将到来的疼痛的恐惧条件线索促进注意力参与。
Neurophysiol Clin. 2004 Feb;34(1):33-9. doi: 10.1016/j.neucli.2003.11.001.
10
Impaired disengagement from threatening cues of impending pain in a crossmodal cueing paradigm.在跨模态线索提示范式中,对即将到来的疼痛的威胁性线索的脱离受损。
Eur J Pain. 2004 Jun;8(3):227-36. doi: 10.1016/j.ejpain.2003.08.005.

引用本文的文献

1
Spatial and feature-based attention to expressive faces.对富有表现力面孔的基于空间和特征的注意力。
Exp Brain Res. 2019 Apr;237(4):967-975. doi: 10.1007/s00221-019-05472-8. Epub 2019 Jan 25.
2
Trait anxiety and the alignment of attentional bias with controllability of danger.特质焦虑与注意偏向和危险可控性的一致性
Psychol Res. 2020 Apr;84(3):743-756. doi: 10.1007/s00426-018-1081-9. Epub 2018 Aug 21.
3
Varying expectancies and attention bias in phobic and non-phobic individuals.恐惧和非恐惧个体的预期变化和注意偏差。
Front Hum Neurosci. 2013 Aug 8;7:418. doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2013.00418. eCollection 2013.
4
Impaired attentional disengagement from stimuli matching the contents of working memory in social anxiety.社交焦虑中,与工作记忆内容相匹配的刺激注意脱离受损。
PLoS One. 2012;7(10):e47221. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0047221. Epub 2012 Oct 12.