Ali Rozina, Bernier Christina, Lin Yu Te, Ching Wei-Cheng, Rodriguez Eduardo P, Cardenas-Mejia Alexander, Henry Steven L, Evans Gregory R D, Cheng Ming-Huei
Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
Ann Plast Surg. 2010 Oct;65(4):398-406. doi: 10.1097/SAP.0b013e3181d9ab27.
Elevation of the deep inferior epigastric perforator (DIEP) flap interrupts its superficial venous system, and if drainage through the deep venous system is inadequate the flap may develop congestion. The purpose of this retrospective study was to determine the fate of the congested DIEP flap and to optimize the strategy for its salvage.
Thirty-two of 162 patients who underwent unilateral breast reconstruction with a DIEP flap developed venous congestion. For the purpose of outcome analysis, cases were retrospectively allocated to "observation-only" (group A, n = 11), postoperative salvage (group B, n = 7), and intraoperative salvage (group C, n = 14), and complications among the various groups were compared to determine the necessity and optimal timing of salvage intervention.
Two flaps (1 in group A, another in group B) failed completely, giving a success rate 98.8%. The complication rate and hospital stay were significantly lower in group C than in group B (P = 0.03, P = 0.02). The rate of venous congestion requiring salvage procedures was 13%, with a salvage rate of 95%. Salvage procedures included venous augmentation with an additional recipient vein in 7 procedures, adding superficial inferior epigastric vein (SIEV) to DIEV in 11 procedures, and substituting with SIEV in 7 procedures. There was no statistical difference in flap salvage rate using the SIEV between "augmentation" and "substitution."
The salvage procedures for venous compromised DIEP flap are better performed intraoperatively rather than postoperatively to prevent further complications. The engorged SIEV could be incorporated by anastomosing to an additional recipient vein or adding to the DIEV-internal mammary vein axis or substituting for DIEV.
腹壁下深动脉穿支(DIEP)皮瓣的提升会中断其浅静脉系统,如果通过深静脉系统的引流不足,皮瓣可能会出现充血。这项回顾性研究的目的是确定充血的DIEP皮瓣的转归,并优化其挽救策略。
162例行单侧乳房重建DIEP皮瓣手术的患者中有32例发生静脉充血。为进行结果分析,将病例回顾性分为“仅观察”组(A组,n = 11)、术后挽救组(B组,n = 7)和术中挽救组(C组,n = 14),比较各组间的并发症情况,以确定挽救干预的必要性和最佳时机。
2个皮瓣(A组1个,B组1个)完全失败,成功率为98.8%。C组的并发症发生率和住院时间显著低于B组(P = 0.03,P = 0.02)。需要挽救手术的静脉充血发生率为13%,挽救率为95%。挽救手术包括7例增加一条额外的受区静脉进行静脉扩容,11例将腹壁浅静脉(SIEV)加入腹壁下深静脉(DIEV),7例用SIEV替代。“扩容”和“替代”使用SIEV的皮瓣挽救率无统计学差异。
对于静脉受损的DIEP皮瓣,挽救手术在术中进行比术后进行更好,以防止进一步的并发症。可通过将扩张的SIEV吻合到一条额外的受区静脉、加入DIEV-胸廓内静脉轴或替代DIEV来纳入。