Suppr超能文献

学生使用模拟器手臂测量血压与使用活体对象手臂测量血压的比较。

Student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm compared with a live subject's arm.

机构信息

University of Connecticut School of Pharmacy, Storrs, CT, USA.

出版信息

Am J Pharm Educ. 2010 Jun 15;74(5). doi: 10.5688/aj740582.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To compare accuracy of blood pressure measurements using a live subject and a simulator arm, and to determine students' preferences regarding measurement.

METHODS

This was a crossover study comparing blood pressure measurements from a live subject and a simulator arm. Students completed an anonymous survey instrument defining opinions on ease of measurement.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven students completed blood pressure measurements on live subjects while 72 students completed blood pressure measurements using the simulator arm. There were no significant systematic differences between the 2 measurement techniques. Systolic blood pressure measurements from a live subject arm were less likely to be within 4 mm Hg compared with measurements of a simulator arm. Diastolic blood pressure measurements were not significantly different between the 2 techniques.

CONCLUSIONS

Accuracy of student measurement of blood pressure using a simulator arm was similar to the accuracy with a live subject. There was no difference in students' preferences regarding measurement techniques.

摘要

目的

比较使用真人手臂和模拟手臂测量血压的准确性,并确定学生对测量方法的偏好。

方法

这是一项交叉研究,比较了真人手臂和模拟手臂测量血压的结果。学生们完成了一份匿名调查工具,对测量的易用性表达了自己的看法。

结果

57 名学生对真人手臂进行了血压测量,72 名学生使用模拟器手臂进行了血压测量。这两种测量技术之间没有显著的系统差异。与模拟手臂相比,来自真人手臂的收缩压测量值更有可能低于 4mmHg。两种技术的舒张压测量值无显著差异。

结论

学生使用模拟器手臂测量血压的准确性与使用真人手臂相似。学生对测量技术的偏好没有差异。

相似文献

引用本文的文献

本文引用的文献

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验