Department of Public and Occupational Health, EMGO+ Institute for Health and Care Research, VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2010 Nov;36(6):488-98. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.3084. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
The aim of this study was to examine the adherence of occupational physicians (OP) to the Dutch guideline on the management of common mental health problems and its effect on return to work as part of the process evaluation of a trial comparing adherence to the guideline to care as usual. The first hypothesis was that guideline adherence among the "guideline group" will be higher compared to the "usual care group". The second hypothesis was that better guideline adherence by the occupational physician will be associated with earlier return to work.
In a randomized controlled trial, five participating OP had to provide care based on the Dutch guideline to 240 police workers with common mental health problems (the "guideline group"). The same OP had to provide usual care to the participants in the control group (the "usual care" group), including minimal involvement and easy access to a psychologist. In evaluating the process, we assessed guideline adherence via an audit of medical files, using 20 guideline-based performance indicators. Mean rates of guideline adherence were related to the duration until first and full return to work, using a Cox proportional hazards model.
The mean rate of the sum score of guideline adherence was 10 in a range of 0-20 [standard deviation (SD) 1.8] and did not significantly differ between the intervention and control group. Mean better guideline adherence showed a statistically significant association with a shorter time to first and full return to work [hazard ratio 1.1; 95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.0-1.2], which was explained by keeping more regular contact with the worker and the work system and better monitoring of stagnation or return to work.
No contrast in guideline adherence was found between guideline-based versus usual care. This can be explained by contamination between the guideline and usual care group. Even though guideline adherence was only average, better adherence predicted earlier return to work. Guidelines for management of common mental health problems and return to work should focus on regular contact with the worker and the work organisation.
本研究旨在检查职业医生(OP)对荷兰常见心理健康问题管理指南的依从性及其对工作回归的影响,这是一项比较指南依从性与常规护理的试验的过程评估的一部分。第一个假设是,“指南组”的指南依从性会高于“常规护理组”。第二个假设是,职业医生更好地遵循指南与更早的工作回归相关。
在一项随机对照试验中,五名参与的 OP 必须根据荷兰常见心理健康问题管理指南为 240 名警察工作者提供护理(“指南组”)。同一名 OP 必须为对照组(“常规护理”组)的参与者提供常规护理,包括最小程度的参与和轻松获得心理学家的帮助。在评估过程中,我们通过对医疗档案进行审核来评估指南的依从性,使用了 20 个基于指南的绩效指标。使用 Cox 比例风险模型,将指南依从性的平均得分率与首次和完全恢复工作的持续时间相关联。
指南依从性总分的平均值为 10 分,范围为 0-20 分[标准差(SD)为 1.8],在干预组和对照组之间没有显著差异。更好的指南依从性的平均值与首次和完全恢复工作的时间更短存在统计学显著关联[风险比 1.1;95%置信区间(95%CI)为 1.0-1.2],这是通过与工人和工作系统保持更规律的联系以及更好地监测停滞或恢复工作来解释的。
未发现基于指南的护理与常规护理之间的指南依从性存在差异。这可以通过指南组和常规护理组之间的交叉污染来解释。尽管指南依从性仅处于平均水平,但更好的依从性预示着更早的工作回归。常见心理健康问题管理和工作回归指南应侧重于与工人和工作组织的定期联系。