• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

随机临床试验比较开腹与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后的炎症和血管生成反应。

Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer.

机构信息

Colorectal Surgery Unit, Department of Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):50-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7258. Epub 2010 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1002/bjs.7258
PMID:20799296
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Several studies have suggested that laparoscopy might confer an oncological advantage in patients undergoing surgery for colonic cancer. A decreased inflammatory and angiogenic response has been proposed. This study compared the local and systemic inflammatory and angiogenic responses after open and laparoscopic surgery for colonic cancer.

METHODS

Some 122 patients with colonic cancer were randomized to open or laparoscopic colectomy. Levels of interleukin (IL) 6 and vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) were measured in serum and peritoneal fluid at baseline, then at 4, 12, 24 and 48 h and on day 4 after surgery. Samples obtained on day 4 were tested in an in vitro angiogenesis assay, with measurement of number of capillaries per field and capillary length.

RESULTS

The serum IL-6 level was lower in the laparoscopic group at 4 h (mean(s.d.) 124(110) versus 244(326) pg/dl after open colectomy; P = 0·027). The serum VEGF concentration was also lower in the laparoscopic group at 48 h and day 4 (430(435) versus 650(686) pg/dl; P = 0·001). Overall, local IL-6 and VEGF levels were significantly higher than serum levels but there were no differences between groups. In vitro, postoperative serum and peritoneal fluid samples were potently angiogenic but there were no differences between open surgery and laparoscopy. Rates of tumour recurrence and survival were similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSION

Despite differences in postoperative serum levels of IL-6 and VEGF after open and laparoscopic surgery in patients with colonic cancer, the angiogenic response is comparable in both surgical approaches.

REGISTRATION NUMBER

ISRCTN55624793 (http://www.controlled-trials.com).

摘要

背景

几项研究表明,腹腔镜手术可能在结肠癌患者的手术中带来肿瘤学优势。有人提出,腹腔镜手术会降低炎症和血管生成反应。本研究比较了开腹和腹腔镜结肠癌手术的局部和全身炎症及血管生成反应。

方法

122 例结肠癌患者随机分为开腹组或腹腔镜组。在基线、术后 4、12、24 和 48 小时以及术后第 4 天测量血清和腹腔液中白细胞介素(IL)6 和血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)的水平。第 4 天采集的样本在体外血管生成测定中进行检测,测量每视野的毛细血管数和毛细血管长度。

结果

腹腔镜组在术后 4 小时时血清 IL-6 水平较低(开腹 colectomy 组为 124(110)pg/dl,腹腔镜组为 244(326)pg/dl;P=0·027)。腹腔镜组术后 48 小时和第 4 天的血清 VEGF 浓度也较低(430(435)pg/dl,腹腔镜组为 650(686)pg/dl;P=0·001)。总体而言,局部 IL-6 和 VEGF 水平明显高于血清水平,但两组之间没有差异。体外实验中,术后血清和腹腔液样本具有明显的血管生成能力,但开腹手术和腹腔镜手术之间没有差异。两组的肿瘤复发率和生存率相似。

结论

尽管开腹和腹腔镜结肠癌手术后患者的血清 IL-6 和 VEGF 水平存在差异,但两种手术方式的血管生成反应相似。

注册号

ISRCTN55624793(http://www.controlled-trials.com)。

相似文献

1
Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer.随机临床试验比较开腹与腹腔镜结直肠癌根治术后的炎症和血管生成反应。
Br J Surg. 2011 Jan;98(1):50-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7258. Epub 2010 Aug 26.
2
Randomized clinical trial comparing inflammatory and angiogenic response after open versus laparoscopic curative resection for colonic cancer (Br J Surg 2011; 98: 50-59).比较结肠癌开放与腹腔镜根治性切除术后炎症和血管生成反应的随机临床试验(《英国外科杂志》2011年;98:50 - 59)
Br J Surg. 2011 May;98(5):745-6; author reply 746. doi: 10.1002/bjs.7514.
3
Comparison of laparoscopic versus conventional technique in colonic and liver resection in a tumor-bearing small animal model.在荷瘤小动物模型中腹腔镜与传统技术在结肠和肝脏切除术中的比较。
Surg Endosc. 2002 Aug;16(8):1175-81. doi: 10.1007/s00464-001-9159-6. Epub 2002 Apr 9.
4
The impact of open versus laparoscopic resection for colon cancer on C-reactive protein concentrations as a predictor of postoperative infective complications.结肠癌开放手术与腹腔镜手术切除对C反应蛋白浓度的影响,作为术后感染性并发症的预测指标。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2015 Mar;22(3):938-43. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-4065-z. Epub 2014 Sep 9.
5
Postoperative intra-abdominal infection and colorectal cancer recurrence: a prospective matched cohort study of inflammatory and angiogenic responses as mechanisms involved in this association.术后腹腔内感染与结直肠癌复发:炎症和血管生成反应作为涉及这种关联的机制的前瞻性匹配队列研究。
Eur J Surg Oncol. 2015 Feb;41(2):208-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2014.10.052. Epub 2014 Nov 1.
6
Laparoscopic versus open hemicolectomy.腹腔镜与开放半结肠切除术
Minerva Chir. 2003 Aug;58(4):491-502, 502-7.
7
What is the effect of laparoscopic colectomy on pattern of colon cancer recurrence? A propensity score and competing risk analysis compared with open colectomy.腹腔镜结肠切除术对结肠癌复发模式有何影响?一项倾向评分与竞争风险分析,并与开腹结肠切除术进行比较。
Ann Surg Oncol. 2014 Aug;21(8):2627-35. doi: 10.1245/s10434-014-3613-x. Epub 2014 Mar 11.
8
Short-term outcomes of the Australasian randomized clinical study comparing laparoscopic and conventional open surgical treatments for colon cancer: the ALCCaS trial.比较腹腔镜与传统开放手术治疗结肠癌的澳大拉西亚随机临床研究的短期结果:ALCCaS试验
Ann Surg. 2008 Nov;248(5):728-38. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e31818b7595.
9
Laparoscopic colonic resections versus open surgery: a prospective non-randomized study on 310 unselected cases.腹腔镜结肠切除术与开放手术:一项对310例未经筛选病例的前瞻性非随机研究。
Hepatogastroenterology. 2000 May-Jun;47(33):697-708.
10
Randomized clinical trial of laparoscopic colectomy with or without natural-orifice specimen extraction.腹腔镜结肠切除术联合与不联合自然腔道取标本的随机临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2015 May;102(6):630-7. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9757. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

引用本文的文献

1
Autogenic splenic implantation versus splenectomy in patients undergoing distal pancreatectomy for benign or low-grade malignant lesions of the distal pancreas: study protocol for a multicentre, open-label, randomized controlled trial (RESTORE).自体脾移植与脾切除术在因胰腺远端良性或低级别恶性病变而行胰远端切除术患者中的应用:一项多中心、开放标签、随机对照试验(RESTORE)的研究方案。
Trials. 2024 Jan 9;25(1):31. doi: 10.1186/s13063-023-07714-1.
2
Impact of laparoscopic versus open surgery on humoral immunity in patients with colorectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.腹腔镜与开放手术对结直肠癌患者体液免疫影响的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Surg Endosc. 2024 Feb;38(2):540-553. doi: 10.1007/s00464-023-10582-0. Epub 2023 Dec 15.
3
Contemporaneous Perioperative Inflammatory and Angiogenic Cytokine Profiles of Surgical Breast, Colorectal, and Prostate Cancer Patients: Clinical Implications.
手术治疗的乳腺癌、结直肠癌和前列腺癌患者围手术期炎症和血管生成细胞因子特征:临床意义。
Cells. 2023 Dec 4;12(23):2767. doi: 10.3390/cells12232767.
4
Postoperative inflammatory response in colorectal cancer surgery: a meta-analysis.结直肠癌手术术后炎症反应:荟萃分析。
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2023 Sep 19;38(1):233. doi: 10.1007/s00384-023-04525-3.
5
Single-incision versus conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis of clinical and pathological outcomes.单切口与传统腹腔镜手术治疗直肠癌:临床和病理结果的荟萃分析
Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2022 Sep;17(3):387-405. doi: 10.5114/wiitm.2022.118158. Epub 2022 Jul 15.
6
Effects of Perioperative Epidural Analgesia on Cancer Recurrence and Survival.围手术期硬膜外镇痛对癌症复发和生存的影响。
Front Oncol. 2022 Jan 5;11:798435. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2021.798435. eCollection 2021.
7
Stress and cancer: mechanisms, significance and future directions.压力与癌症:机制、意义及未来方向。
Nat Rev Cancer. 2021 Dec;21(12):767-785. doi: 10.1038/s41568-021-00395-5. Epub 2021 Sep 10.
8
Breast cancer and the black swan.乳腺癌与黑天鹅
Ecancermedicalscience. 2020 May 28;14:1050. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2020.1050. eCollection 2020.
9
The Length of Surgical Skin Incision in Postoperative Inflammatory Reaction.手术皮肤切口长度与术后炎症反应
JSLS. 2018 Oct-Dec;22(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2018.00045.
10
Clinical Outcomes of Reduced-Port Laparoscopic Surgery for Patients With Sigmoid Colon Cancer: Surgery With 1 Surgeon and 1 Camera Operator.乙状结肠癌患者经自然腔道内镜手术的临床结果:由1名外科医生和1名摄像师操作的手术
Ann Coloproctol. 2018 Dec;34(6):292-298. doi: 10.3393/ac.2018.04.06. Epub 2018 Dec 3.