Dammann Kristen Wiig, Smith Chery
Scientific and Regulatory Affairs, Cargill, Inc, Wayzata, MN, USA.
J Am Diet Assoc. 2010 Sep;110(9):1351-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jada.2010.06.007.
Observance of the hunger-obesity paradox in urban Minnesota has ignited interest in the quality of low-income households' food purchases. This cross-sectional study investigated low-income, urban Minnesotan women's past-month food purchases and their associations with race, homelessness, and aspects of the food system, including food shelf (ie, food pantry) and food store usage, factors believed to influence food choice and grocery shopping behavior. The survey included demographics, the US Department of Agriculture's 18-item Household Food Security Survey Module, and grocery shopping questions related to food purchases and food stores visited in the past month. Participants were a convenience sample of 448 low-income, urban Minnesotan women, and data were collected from February through May 2008. The sample was 44% African American, 35% American Indian, 10% white, and 11% other/mixed race; 37% were homeless. Rates of "less healthy" food group purchases were higher compared to "healthy" food group purchases. Significant racial differences were found with respect to purchasing healthy protein food groups (P<0.05 to P<0.01) but not fruits, vegetables, or whole grains. Homelessness reduced the odds of purchasing most food groups, regardless of nutrient density (P<0.05 to P<0.001). Food shelf and food store usage mainly increased the odds of purchasing "less healthy" food groups (P<0.05 to P<0.01). These findings may help registered dietitians strategize with low-income, urban women how to make best use of food resources within their local food system.
明尼苏达州城市地区饥饿与肥胖悖论的存在引发了人们对低收入家庭食品购买质量的关注。这项横断面研究调查了明尼苏达州城市地区低收入女性过去一个月的食品购买情况,以及这些购买行为与种族、无家可归状况和食品系统各方面(包括食品救济站(即食品储藏室)和食品店的使用情况)之间的关联,这些因素被认为会影响食物选择和食品购物行为。该调查包括人口统计学信息、美国农业部的18项家庭食品安全调查模块,以及与过去一个月的食品购买和光顾的食品店相关的食品购物问题。参与者是448名明尼苏达州城市地区低收入女性的便利样本,数据收集于2008年2月至5月。样本中44%为非裔美国人,35%为美洲印第安人,10%为白人,11%为其他/混合种族;37%无家可归。与“健康”食品组购买率相比,“不太健康”食品组的购买率更高。在购买健康蛋白质食品组方面发现了显著的种族差异(P<0.05至P<0.01),但在水果、蔬菜或全谷物方面没有差异。无家可归状况降低了购买大多数食品组的几率,无论营养密度如何(P<0.05至P<0.001)。食品救济站和食品店的使用主要增加了购买“不太健康”食品组的几率(P<0.05至P<0.01)。这些发现可能有助于注册营养师与城市低收入女性制定策略,以如何在当地食品系统中最佳利用食品资源。