Physiotherapy and Population Science, University College Dublin, Dublin, Republic of Ireland.
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9):1383-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.023.
To investigate whether 2 different mechanisms of ankle joint taping ([1] lateral subtalar sling or [2] fibular repositioning) can enhance actual and perceived dynamic postural stability in participants with chronic ankle instability (CAI).
Laboratory-based repeated-measures study.
University biomechanics laboratory.
Participants (n=16) with CAI.
Participants performed the Star Excursion Balance Test (SEBT) under 3 different conditions: (1) no tape, (2) lateral subtalar sling taping and (3) fibular repositioning taping.
Reach distances in the anterior, posteromedial, and posterolateral directions on the SEBT. Participants' perceptions of stability, confidence, and reassurance when performing the SEBT under 2 different taping conditions.
Taping did not improve reach distance on the SEBT (P>.05). Feelings of confidence increased for 56% of participants (P=.002) under both tape conditions. Feelings of stability increased for 87.5% of participants (P<.001) using condition 2 (lateral subtalar sling taping) and 75% of participants (P=.001) using condition 3 (fibular repositioning taping). Feelings of reassurance increased for 68.75% of participants (P=.001) using condition 2 (lateral subtalar sling taping) and 50% of participants (P=.005) using condition 3 (fibular repositioning taping).
No significant change in dynamic postural stability was observed after application of either taping mechanism; however, participants' perceptions of confidence, stability, and reassurance were significantly improved. Further research is necessary to fully elucidate the exact mechanisms by which taping may help reduce the incidence of repeated injury in subjects with CAI.
研究两种不同的踝关节贴扎机制([1] 外踝下支持带或[2] 腓骨复位)是否能提高慢性踝关节不稳(CAI)患者的实际和感知动态平衡稳定性。
基于实验室的重复测量研究。
大学生物力学实验室。
患有 CAI 的参与者。
参与者在 3 种不同条件下进行了星状伸展平衡测试(SEBT):(1)无贴扎,(2)外踝下支持带贴扎,(3)腓骨复位贴扎。
SEBT 前、后内侧和后外侧的伸展距离。参与者在两种不同贴扎条件下进行 SEBT 时对稳定性、信心和安心的感知。
贴扎并未改善 SEBT 的伸展距离(P>.05)。在两种贴扎条件下,56%的参与者(P=.002)的信心感增加。87.5%的参与者(P<.001)使用条件 2(外踝下支持带贴扎)和 75%的参与者(P=.001)使用条件 3(腓骨复位贴扎)的稳定感增加。68.75%的参与者(P=.001)使用条件 2(外踝下支持带贴扎)和 50%的参与者(P=.005)使用条件 3(腓骨复位贴扎)的安心感增加。
应用两种贴扎机制后,动态平衡稳定性均无显著变化;然而,参与者的信心、稳定和安心感显著提高。需要进一步研究以充分阐明贴扎可能有助于降低 CAI 患者重复受伤发生率的确切机制。