• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

下肢截肢患者爬楼梯问卷的构建效度和重测信度。

Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the climbing stairs questionnaire in lower-limb amputees.

机构信息

Rehabilitation Centre Leijpark, Tilburg, The Netherlands.

出版信息

Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.013.

DOI:10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.013
PMID:20801258
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the construct validity and test-retest reliability of the Climbing Stairs Questionnaire, a patient-reported measure of activity limitations in climbing stairs, in lower-limb amputees.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Outpatient department of a rehabilitation center.

PARTICIPANTS

Lower-limb amputees (N=172; mean +/- SD age, 65+/-12y; 71% men; 82% vascular cause) participated in the study; 33 participated in the reliability study.

INTERVENTIONS

Not applicable.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Construct validity was investigated by testing 10 hypotheses: limitations in climbing stairs according to the Climbing Stairs Questionnaire will be greater in lower-limb amputees who: (1) are older, (2) have a vascular cause of amputation, (3) have a bilateral amputation, (4) have a higher level of amputation, (5) have more comorbid conditions, (6) had their rehabilitation treatment in a nursing home, and (7) climb fewer flights of stairs. Furthermore, limitations in climbing stairs will be related positively to activity limitations according to: (8) the Locomotor Capabilities Index, (9) the Questionnaire Rising and Sitting down, and (10) the Walking Questionnaire. Construct validity was quantified by using the Mann-Whitney U test, Kruskal-Wallis test, and Spearman correlation coefficient. Test-retest reliability was assessed with a 3-week interval and quantified using the intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).

RESULTS

Construct validity (8 of 10 null hypotheses not rejected) and test-retest reliability were good (ICC=.79; 95% confidence interval, .57-.90).

CONCLUSION

The Climbing Stairs Questionnaire has good construct validity and test-retest reliability in lower-limb amputees.

摘要

目的

调查爬楼梯问卷的结构效度和重测信度,爬楼梯问卷是一种衡量下肢截肢患者爬楼梯活动受限的患者报告测量工具。

设计

横断面研究。

地点

康复中心的门诊。

参与者

下肢截肢患者(N=172;平均年龄 +/- 标准差,65 +/- 12 岁;71%男性;82%血管原因)参加了研究;33 人参加了可靠性研究。

干预措施

不适用。

主要观察指标

结构效度通过检验 10 个假设进行评估:根据爬楼梯问卷,下肢截肢患者在以下情况下爬楼梯的限制更大:(1)年龄较大,(2)血管原因截肢,(3)双侧截肢,(4)截肢水平较高,(5)合并症更多,(6)在养老院接受康复治疗,以及(7)爬的楼梯层数较少。此外,爬楼梯的限制将与根据以下内容活动受限呈正相关:(8)运动能力指数、(9)上下楼梯问卷和(10)步行问卷。结构效度通过 Mann-Whitney U 检验、Kruskal-Wallis 检验和 Spearman 相关系数进行量化。重测信度间隔 3 周进行评估,并通过组内相关系数(ICC)进行量化。

结果

结构效度(10 个无效假设中有 8 个未被拒绝)和重测信度良好(ICC=.79;95%置信区间,.57-.90)。

结论

爬楼梯问卷在下肢截肢患者中具有良好的结构效度和重测信度。

相似文献

1
Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the climbing stairs questionnaire in lower-limb amputees.下肢截肢患者爬楼梯问卷的构建效度和重测信度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2010 Sep;91(9):1396-401. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2010.06.013.
2
Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the questionnaire rising and sitting down in lower-limb amputees.下肢截肢者起身和坐下问卷的结构效度和重测信度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2011 Aug;92(8):1305-10. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.03.016.
3
Construct validity and test-retest reliability of the walking questionnaire in people with a lower limb amputation.下肢截肢患者行走问卷的结构效度和重测信度。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2012 Jun;93(6):983-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2011.11.030. Epub 2012 Mar 16.
4
Climbing stairs after outpatient rehabilitation for a lower-limb amputation.下肢截肢患者门诊康复后爬楼梯。
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2013 Aug;94(8):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2013.01.020. Epub 2013 Feb 4.
5
The Locomotor Capabilities Index; validity and reliability of the Swedish version in adults with lower limb amputation.运动能力指数;瑞典语版本在下肢截肢成年人中的效度和信度
Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2009 May 23;7:44. doi: 10.1186/1477-7525-7-44.
6
Test-retest reliability of the special interest group on amputation medicine/Dutch working group on amputations and prosthetics mobility scale, in persons wearing a prosthesis after a lower-limb amputation.下肢截肢后佩戴假肢者截肢医学特殊兴趣小组/荷兰截肢和假肢移动性工作组移动性量表的重测信度。
Disabil Rehabil. 2020 Jun;42(12):1762-1766. doi: 10.1080/09638288.2018.1528304. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
7
A post-discharge quality of life outcome measure for lower limb amputees: test-retest reliability and construct validity.
Clin Rehabil. 2003 Dec;17(8):858-64. doi: 10.1191/0269215503cr689oa.
8
Psychometric properties of the Activities-specific Balance Confidence Scale among individuals with a lower-limb amputation.下肢截肢个体特定活动平衡信心量表的心理测量特性
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2003 May;84(5):656-61. doi: 10.1016/s0003-9993(02)04807-4.
9
Reliability, Validity, and Responsiveness of the QuickDASH in Patients With Upper Limb Amputation.上肢截肢患者快速上肢功能障碍问卷(QuickDASH)的信度、效度及反应度
Arch Phys Med Rehabil. 2015 Sep;96(9):1676-83. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2015.03.023. Epub 2015 Apr 23.
10
Transcultural adaptation and validation of a French version of the Prosthetic Limb Users Survey of Mobility 12-item Short-Form (PLUS-M/FC-12) in active amputees.跨文化调适与验证:一种针对活跃截肢者的《假体使用者移动性调查 12 项简短表单》(PLUS-M/FC-12)法语版。
Ann Phys Rehabil Med. 2019 May;62(3):142-148. doi: 10.1016/j.rehab.2019.02.006. Epub 2019 Apr 6.

引用本文的文献

1
Comparison of trauma and diabetes mellitus-induced transtibial amputees in terms of gait parameters and functional capacity.创伤性与糖尿病性经胫骨截肢者在步态参数和功能能力方面的比较。
Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2025 Mar;31(3):259-268. doi: 10.14744/tjtes.2024.83923.
2
Recommendations from the ISPO lower-limb COMPASS: Patient-reported and performance-based outcome measures.ISPO 下肢 COMPASS 推荐:患者报告和基于表现的结局测量指标。
Prosthet Orthot Int. 2023 Feb 1;47(1):13-25. doi: 10.1097/PXR.0000000000000197. Epub 2023 Jan 5.