Suppr超能文献

冠状动脉 256 层 CT 血管造影的最佳收缩期和舒张期图像重建窗。

Optimal systolic and diastolic image reconstruction windows for coronary 256-slice CT angiography.

机构信息

Department of Imaging and Interventional Radiology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.

出版信息

Acad Radiol. 2010 Nov;17(11):1386-93. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2010.06.011.

Abstract

RATIONALE AND OBJECTIVES

The aims of this study were to determine the optimal image reconstruction intervals for the systolic and diastolic phases of coronary computed tomographic angiography on 256-slice computed tomography and to assess their associated motion artifacts.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

One hundred twenty-six patients were recruited (mean heart rate [HR], 72.1 beats/min; heart rate variability, 1.3 beats/min). Twenty data sets were reconstructed in 5% steps through 0% to 95% of the R-R interval. Two reviewers discriminated optimal reconstruction intervals for 15 segments distributed in three coronary arteries on the basis of motion artifacts, which were graded from 1 (no motion artifacts) to 4 (severe motion artifacts preventing diagnosis). Patients were then stratified into four HR groups for motion score comparison according to the results of a correlation analysis of HR and motion scores.

RESULTS

The optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction intervals were 44.4 ± 3.8% and 77.4 ± 3.7%, respectively. The mean motion scores for systolic, diastolic, and combined systolic and diastolic (S+D) reconstructions were 1.8 ± 0.3, 1.8 ± 0.5, and 1.5 ± 0.3, respectively. Combined S+D reconstruction improved diagnostic evaluability to 100% and showed fewer motion artifacts compared to single-phase reconstructions for all HR ranges (S+D vs systolic, P < .05 for HR < 85 beats/min; S+D vs diastolic, P < .05 for HRs of 73-84 beats/min). For HRs of 60 to 72 beats/min, motion artifacts were significantly lower for diastole (1.6 ± 0.3) than systole (1.8 ± 0.4) (P < .001), and vice versa for HRs of 73 to 84 beats/min (1.7 ± 0.3 for systole vs 2.0 ± 0.5 for diastole, P < .01).

CONCLUSIONS

Optimal systolic and diastolic reconstruction intervals were determined for this 256-slice coronary computed tomographic angiographic study. Combined reconstruction showed fewer motion artifacts compared to single-phase reconstruction. In conclusion, 256-slice computed tomography has the potential to improve the diagnostic accuracy of coronary computed tomographic angiography.

摘要

背景与目的

本研究旨在确定 256 层 CT 冠状动脉 CT 血管造影(CCTA)收缩期和舒张期的最佳图像重建时相,并评估其相关运动伪影。

材料与方法

共纳入 126 例患者(平均心率[HR]为 72.1 次/分;HR 变异性为 1.3 次/分)。20 组数据以 5%的步长重建,范围为 0%至 95%的 RR 间期。两名观察者根据运动伪影,对 3 支冠状动脉的 15 个节段的最佳重建时相进行区分,运动伪影评分范围为 1(无运动伪影)至 4(严重运动伪影导致诊断困难)。然后,根据 HR 与运动评分的相关性分析结果,将患者分为 4 个 HR 组,比较运动评分。

结果

最佳收缩期和舒张期重建时相分别为 44.4%±3.8%和 77.4%±3.7%。收缩期、舒张期和收缩期+舒张期(S+D)重建的平均运动评分分别为 1.8±0.3、1.8±0.5 和 1.5±0.3。与单时相重建相比,S+D 重建可将诊断可评估性提高至 100%,且在所有 HR 范围内(S+D 比收缩期,HR<85 次/分,P<0.05;S+D 比舒张期,HR 为 73-84 次/分,P<0.05)运动伪影均较少。对于 HR 为 60-72 次/分,舒张期(1.6±0.3)的运动伪影明显低于收缩期(1.8±0.4)(P<0.001),而 HR 为 73-84 次/分时则相反(收缩期 1.7±0.3 比舒张期 2.0±0.5,P<0.01)。

结论

本 256 层 CCTA 研究确定了最佳的收缩期和舒张期重建时相。与单时相重建相比,联合重建可减少运动伪影。总之,256 层 CT 有可能提高 CCTA 的诊断准确性。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验