de Oliveira Lucia Conde, Pinheiro Roseni
Universidade Estadual do Ceará, Fortaleza, CE, 60740-000.
Cien Saude Colet. 2010 Aug;15(5):2455-64. doi: 10.1590/s1413-81232010000500020.
The objective of this paper is to analyse the participation of current health councils in a city in the north-eastern of Brazil and its relationship with local political culture. The following theoretical presumption served as starting point: The practices adopted by health councils initiate a new institution that involves new social actors - the users - in the public sphere. The process of democratisation in the Brazilian society expands this sphere and leads to a confrontation of traditional and democratic political cultures. This is a qualitative research with the following data collection methods: documentary analysis, participant observation and semi-structured interviews. Within the evidence emerged, the dominance of traditional political culture resulted as one of the conditioning elements of participation practices in the Council, expressed in the authoritarianism and cooptation involving municipal managers and representatives of civil society. The majority of counsellors recognises the fragile power of the Council in terms of deliberative and fiscal issues. Despite confirming the frailties of the health councils, it is obvious that their importance in the democratisation of the relationship between State and civil society in the fight for the implementation of the right to health care.
本文的目的是分析巴西东北部一个城市当前卫生委员会的参与情况及其与当地政治文化的关系。以下理论假设作为出发点:卫生委员会采取的做法启动了一个新机构,该机构在公共领域纳入了新的社会行为者——用户。巴西社会的民主化进程扩大了这一领域,并导致传统政治文化与民主政治文化的对抗。这是一项定性研究,采用了以下数据收集方法:文献分析、参与观察和半结构化访谈。在所出现的证据中,传统政治文化的主导地位是委员会参与实践的制约因素之一,表现为市政管理人员和民间社会代表的威权主义和拉拢行为。大多数顾问认识到委员会在审议和财政问题方面权力薄弱。尽管证实了卫生委员会的脆弱性,但很明显,它们在争取实现医疗保健权的斗争中,对于国家与民间社会关系的民主化具有重要意义。