Gailey Robert, McFarland Lynne V, Cooper Rory A, Czerniecki Joseph, Gambel Jeffrey M, Hubbard Sharon, Maynard Charles, Smith Douglas G, Raya Michele, Reiber Gayle E
Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Miami Healthcare System, Miami, FL, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):317-31. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0039.
Rehabilitation goals following major combat-associated limb loss in World War II and the Vietnam war focused on treatment of the injury and a return to civilian life. The goal for Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) servicemembers is to restore function to the greatest possible degree and, if they desire, return them to Active Duty, by providing them with extensive rehabilitation services and a variety of prosthetic devices. Our study determines the usefulness of these diverse types of prosthetic devices for restoring functional capability and documents prosthesis use and satisfaction. We compare servicemembers and veterans with major combat-associated unilateral lower-limb loss: 178 from the Vietnam war and 172 from OIF/OEF conflicts. Of survey participants with unilateral lower-limb loss, 84% of the Vietnam group and 94% of the OIF/OEF group currently use at least one prosthetic device. Reasons for rejection varied by type of device, but common reasons were pain, prosthesis too heavy, and poor fit. Abandonment is infrequent (11% Vietnam group, 4% OIF/OEF group). Future efforts should aim to improve prosthetic-device design, decrease pain, and improve quality of life for these veterans and servicemembers.
第二次世界大战和越南战争中与重大战斗相关的肢体缺失后的康复目标侧重于损伤治疗和回归平民生活。伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动(OIF/OEF)的军人的目标是通过为他们提供广泛的康复服务和各种假肢装置,尽可能最大程度地恢复功能,并在他们愿意的情况下让他们重返现役。我们的研究确定了这些不同类型的假肢装置在恢复功能能力方面的有用性,并记录了假肢的使用情况和满意度。我们比较了与重大战斗相关的单侧下肢缺失的军人和退伍军人:178名来自越南战争,172名来自OIF/OEF冲突。在单侧下肢缺失的调查参与者中,越南组84%和OIF/OEF组94%目前至少使用一种假肢装置。拒绝使用的原因因装置类型而异,但常见原因是疼痛、假肢过重和贴合度差。弃用情况很少见(越南组11%,OIF/OEF组4%)。未来的努力应旨在改进假肢装置设计、减轻疼痛,并改善这些退伍军人和军人的生活质量。