• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

轮式移动性:影响越战及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中肢体严重创伤的退伍军人和现役军人移动性及辅助技术的因素。

Wheeled mobility: factors influencing mobility and assistive technology in veterans and servicemembers with major traumatic limb loss from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts.

作者信息

Laferrier Justin Z, McFarland Lynne V, Boninger Michael L, Cooper Rory A, Reiber Gayle E

机构信息

Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-1206, USA.

出版信息

J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):349-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0022.

DOI:10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0022
PMID:20803403
Abstract

Returning wounded veterans and servicemembers to their highest level of function following traumatic injury is a priority of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs. We surveyed 245 veterans from the Vietnam war and 226 servicemembers and veterans from Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) conflicts with at least one major traumatic lower-limb loss to determine their use of mobility assistive technology (AT) and patterns of limb abandonment. Prosthetic device use without wheelchair use is found in 50.5% of Vietnam and 42.8% of OIF/OEF groups. Prostheses and supplementary wheelchairs are used by Vietnam (32%) and OIF/OEF (53%) groups (p < 0.01). Exclusive wheelchair use is more frequent in the Vietnam group (18%) than in the OIF/OEF group (4.0%, p < 0.01). In Vietnam participants, multivariate analysis found that multiple-limb loss (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 14.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-38.5), bilateral lower-limb loss (AOR = 12.7; 95% CI 6.2-26.1), and number of comorbidities (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.5) are associated with increased likelihood of wheelchair use. In OIF/OEF participants, bilateral lower-limb loss (AOR = 29.8; 95% CI 11.0-80.7), multiple-limb loss (AOR = 16.3; 95% CI 3.1-85.3), cumulative trauma disorder (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.9), and number of combat injuries (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) are associated with wheelchair use. Combined use of different types of mobility ATs promotes improved rehabilitation and ability to function.

摘要

让受伤退伍军人和军人在遭受创伤性损伤后恢复到最高功能水平是国防部和退伍军人事务部的一项优先任务。我们调查了245名越南战争退伍军人以及226名伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动(OIF/OEF)冲突中的军人和退伍军人,他们至少有一处严重的下肢创伤性缺失,以确定他们对移动辅助技术(AT)的使用情况和肢体舍弃模式。在越南组中,50.5%的人使用假肢而不使用轮椅,在OIF/OEF组中这一比例为42.8%。越南组(32%)和OIF/OEF组(53%)使用假肢和辅助轮椅(p < 0.01)。越南组(18%)比OIF/OEF组(4.0%,p < 0.01)更频繁地单独使用轮椅。在越南参与者中,多变量分析发现,多肢体缺失(调整后的优势比[AOR]=14.5;95%置信区间[CI]5.5 - 38.5)、双侧下肢缺失(AOR = 12.7;95% CI 6.2 - 26.1)以及合并症数量(AOR = 1.3;95% CI 1.2 - 1.5)与使用轮椅的可能性增加相关。在OIF/OEF参与者中,双侧下肢缺失(AOR = 29.8;95% CI 11.0 - 80.7)、多肢体缺失(AOR = 16.3;95% CI 3.1 - 85.3)、累积创伤障碍(AOR = 2.4;95% CI 1.2 - 4.9)以及战斗受伤数量(AOR = 1.4;95% CI 1.2 - 1.7)与使用轮椅相关。不同类型移动辅助技术的联合使用可促进康复改善和功能恢复。

相似文献

1
Wheeled mobility: factors influencing mobility and assistive technology in veterans and servicemembers with major traumatic limb loss from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts.轮式移动性:影响越战及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中肢体严重创伤的退伍军人和现役军人移动性及辅助技术的因素。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):349-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0022.
2
Quality of life for veterans and servicemembers with major traumatic limb loss from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts.越南战争以及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中遭受严重肢体创伤性缺失的退伍军人和军人的生活质量。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):373-85. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0023.
3
Multiple traumatic limb loss: a comparison of Vietnam veterans to OIF/OEF servicemembers.多发性创伤肢体缺失:越南战争退伍军人与伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动服役人员的比较。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):333-48. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0043.
4
Servicemembers and veterans with major traumatic limb loss from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts: survey methods, participants, and summary findings.越战及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中遭受严重肢体创伤性缺失的军人和退伍军人:调查方法、参与者及总结性发现。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):275-97. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2010.01.0009.
5
Unilateral upper-limb loss: satisfaction and prosthetic-device use in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts.单侧上肢缺失:越南战争以及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中的退伍军人和现役军人的满意度及假肢使用情况
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):299-316. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0027.
6
Comparison of satisfaction with current prosthetic care in veterans and servicemembers from Vietnam and OIF/OEF conflicts with major traumatic limb loss.越南战争以及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中肢体严重创伤的退伍军人和现役军人对当前假肢护理满意度的比较
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):361-71. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.12.0193.
7
Prosthetic cost projections for servicemembers with major limb loss from Vietnam and OIF/OEF.越南战争以及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动中严重肢体缺失的军人假肢费用预测。
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):387-402. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0037.
8
Unilateral lower-limb loss: prosthetic device use and functional outcomes in servicemembers from Vietnam war and OIF/OEF conflicts.单侧下肢缺失:越战及伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动冲突中服役军人的假肢使用情况及功能结局
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):317-31. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.04.0039.
9
Combat-incurred bilateral transfemoral limb loss: a comparison of the Vietnam War to the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq.战斗导致双侧股骨截肢:对越战、阿富汗战争和伊拉克战争的比较。
J Trauma Acute Care Surg. 2012 Dec;73(6):1590-5. doi: 10.1097/TA.0b013e318265fe64.
10
Bilateral transfemoral/transtibial amputations due to battle injuries: a comparison of Vietnam veterans with Iraq and Afghanistan servicemembers.因战斗受伤导致的双侧股/胫骨截肢:越战老兵与伊拉克和阿富汗服役军人的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2014 Oct;472(10):3010-6. doi: 10.1007/s11999-014-3534-9.

引用本文的文献

1
Serving Vietnam Veterans Hospitalized Outside the VA System: A Scoping Review of Presumptive Service-Related Illnesses and Presentations.为在退伍军人事务部(VA)系统之外住院的越南退伍军人提供服务:对推定与服役相关疾病及临床表现的范围审查。
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 May 15. doi: 10.1007/s11606-025-09601-8.
2
Racial disparities in prosthesis abandonment and mobility outcomes after lower limb amputation from a dysvascular etiology in a veteran population.退伍军人中因血管性病因导致下肢截肢后假体弃用和活动能力结果的种族差异。
PM R. 2025 Feb;17(2):137-146. doi: 10.1002/pmrj.13240. Epub 2024 Aug 5.
3
Upper Limb Function in People With Upper and Lower Limb Loss 8 Years Postinjury: The Armed Services Trauma Outcome Study (ADVANCE) Cohort Study.
上肢损伤 8 年后上肢和下肢丧失功能的人:武装部队创伤结果研究(ADVANCE)队列研究。
Phys Ther. 2024 Oct 2;104(10). doi: 10.1093/ptj/pzae082.
4
Current Life Experiences in Veterans with Limb Loss: A Description of Survey Methods and Summary Results.肢体缺失退伍军人的当前生活经历:调查方法描述及总结结果
J Rehabil. 2022 Jul-Sep;88(3):20-28.
5
Patient-reported Outcome Measures following Traumatic Lower Extremity Amputation: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.创伤性下肢截肢后的患者报告结局指标:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2021 Nov 11;9(11):e3920. doi: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000003920. eCollection 2021 Nov.
6
The Voice of the Consumer: A Survey of Veterans and Other Users of Assistive Technology.消费者之声:对退伍军人及其他辅助技术使用者的调查
Mil Med. 2018 Nov 1;183(11-12):e518-e525. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usy033.
7
The future of the provision process for mobility assistive technology: a survey of providers.移动辅助技术供应流程的未来:对供应商的一项调查
Disabil Rehabil Assist Technol. 2019 May;14(4):338-345. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1448470. Epub 2018 Mar 20.
8
Consumer Feedback to Steer the Future of Assistive Technology Research and Development: A Pilot Study.消费者反馈引领辅助技术研发的未来:一项试点研究。
Top Spinal Cord Inj Rehabil. 2017 Spring;23(2):89-97. doi: 10.1310/sci2302-89.
9
Traumatic amputations.创伤性截肢
Br J Pain. 2013 May;7(2):67-73. doi: 10.1177/2049463713487324.
10
Special Considerations for Multiple Limb Amputation.多肢体截肢的特殊考虑因素。
Curr Phys Med Rehabil Rep. 2014;2(4):273-289. doi: 10.1007/s40141-014-0067-9.