Laferrier Justin Z, McFarland Lynne V, Boninger Michael L, Cooper Rory A, Reiber Gayle E
Human Engineering Research Laboratories, Department of Veterans Affairs (VA) Rehabilitation Research and Development Service, Pittsburgh, PA 15206-1206, USA.
J Rehabil Res Dev. 2010;47(4):349-60. doi: 10.1682/jrrd.2009.03.0022.
Returning wounded veterans and servicemembers to their highest level of function following traumatic injury is a priority of the Departments of Defense and Veterans Affairs. We surveyed 245 veterans from the Vietnam war and 226 servicemembers and veterans from Operation Iraqi Freedom/Operation Enduring Freedom (OIF/OEF) conflicts with at least one major traumatic lower-limb loss to determine their use of mobility assistive technology (AT) and patterns of limb abandonment. Prosthetic device use without wheelchair use is found in 50.5% of Vietnam and 42.8% of OIF/OEF groups. Prostheses and supplementary wheelchairs are used by Vietnam (32%) and OIF/OEF (53%) groups (p < 0.01). Exclusive wheelchair use is more frequent in the Vietnam group (18%) than in the OIF/OEF group (4.0%, p < 0.01). In Vietnam participants, multivariate analysis found that multiple-limb loss (adjusted odds ratio [AOR] = 14.5; 95% confidence interval [CI] 5.5-38.5), bilateral lower-limb loss (AOR = 12.7; 95% CI 6.2-26.1), and number of comorbidities (AOR = 1.3; 95% CI 1.2-1.5) are associated with increased likelihood of wheelchair use. In OIF/OEF participants, bilateral lower-limb loss (AOR = 29.8; 95% CI 11.0-80.7), multiple-limb loss (AOR = 16.3; 95% CI 3.1-85.3), cumulative trauma disorder (AOR = 2.4; 95% CI 1.2-4.9), and number of combat injuries (AOR = 1.4; 95% CI 1.2-1.7) are associated with wheelchair use. Combined use of different types of mobility ATs promotes improved rehabilitation and ability to function.
让受伤退伍军人和军人在遭受创伤性损伤后恢复到最高功能水平是国防部和退伍军人事务部的一项优先任务。我们调查了245名越南战争退伍军人以及226名伊拉克自由行动/持久自由行动(OIF/OEF)冲突中的军人和退伍军人,他们至少有一处严重的下肢创伤性缺失,以确定他们对移动辅助技术(AT)的使用情况和肢体舍弃模式。在越南组中,50.5%的人使用假肢而不使用轮椅,在OIF/OEF组中这一比例为42.8%。越南组(32%)和OIF/OEF组(53%)使用假肢和辅助轮椅(p < 0.01)。越南组(18%)比OIF/OEF组(4.0%,p < 0.01)更频繁地单独使用轮椅。在越南参与者中,多变量分析发现,多肢体缺失(调整后的优势比[AOR]=14.5;95%置信区间[CI]5.5 - 38.5)、双侧下肢缺失(AOR = 12.7;95% CI 6.2 - 26.1)以及合并症数量(AOR = 1.3;95% CI 1.2 - 1.5)与使用轮椅的可能性增加相关。在OIF/OEF参与者中,双侧下肢缺失(AOR = 29.8;95% CI 11.0 - 80.7)、多肢体缺失(AOR = 16.3;95% CI 3.1 - 85.3)、累积创伤障碍(AOR = 2.4;95% CI 1.2 - 4.9)以及战斗受伤数量(AOR = 1.4;95% CI 1.2 - 1.7)与使用轮椅相关。不同类型移动辅助技术的联合使用可促进康复改善和功能恢复。