Van Hoan Nguyen, Mouquet-Rivier Claire, Eymard-Duvernay Sabrina, Treche Serge
Research unit 204 Nutripass, Preventing malnutrition and associated pathologies, IRD/UM1/UM2/SupAgro, Montpellier, France.
Asia Pac J Clin Nutr. 2010;19(3):308-15.
Extrusion cooking and amylase addition are two processing methods used for the preparation of high energy dense (ED) gruels of suitable consistency. A quantitative study of energy and nutrient intakes of 67 infants aged 6 to 10 months in rural areas in Vietnam was carried out to compare the effects of these processes used alone or in combination. Twice a day, for a period of four days each, infants successively ate four gruels prepared from different flours based on a blend of rice, sesame and soybean: an instant flour obtained by extrusion cooking (gruel A), a ready-to-cook flour obtained by extrusion cooking plus alpha-amylase addition (gruel B), a flour produced by milling crude rice, sesame and roasted soybean plus alpha-amylase addition (gruel C) and without amylase (control gruel D). Gruels A, B and C had a high ED of respectively 94, 122 and 124 kcal/100 g while the control gruel D had a low ED (59 kcal/100 g). The intakes of the four gruels were inversely linked to their ED. However, despite the fact that gruels B and C had similar ED, larger intakes were obtained with gruel B, which was attributed to better acceptability. The average energy intakes of high ED gruels A, B and C, respectively 112, 134 and 117 kcal/meal, were significantly higher than that of gruel D (81 kcal/meal). Of the three processing methods, the one combining extrusion cooking and amylase addition gave the best results in terms of gruel acceptability and energy intake.
挤压蒸煮和添加淀粉酶是两种用于制备具有适宜稠度的高能量密度(ED)稀粥的加工方法。对越南农村地区67名6至10个月大婴儿的能量和营养摄入量进行了定量研究,以比较单独使用或联合使用这些加工方法的效果。婴儿每天吃两次,每次持续四天,依次食用由大米、芝麻和大豆混合制成的不同面粉制备的四种稀粥:通过挤压蒸煮获得的速溶面粉(稀粥A)、通过挤压蒸煮并添加α-淀粉酶获得的即煮面粉(稀粥B)、由糙米、芝麻和烤大豆研磨并添加α-淀粉酶制成的面粉(稀粥C)以及不添加淀粉酶的面粉(对照稀粥D)。稀粥A、B和C的能量密度较高,分别为94、122和124千卡/100克,而对照稀粥D的能量密度较低(59千卡/100克)。四种稀粥的摄入量与它们的能量密度呈负相关。然而,尽管稀粥B和C的能量密度相似,但稀粥B的摄入量更高,这归因于更好的可接受性。高能量密度稀粥A、B和C的平均能量摄入量分别为每餐112、134和117千卡,显著高于稀粥D(每餐81千卡)。在这三种加工方法中,结合挤压蒸煮和添加淀粉酶的方法在稀粥可接受性和能量摄入方面取得了最佳效果。