West China Hospital of Stomatology, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.
Clin Cancer Res. 2010 Oct 1;16(19):4732-41. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-1408. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
PURPOSE: This study aimed to investigate the functional difference between hypoxia inducible factor (HIF)-1α and HIF-2α in oral squamous cell carcinomas (OSCC). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: We evaluated the correlations between HIF-1α and HIF-2α expression and the clinical-pathologic characteristics of 97 patients with OSCC by immunohistochemical staining. OSCC cell lines transfected with lentivirus encoding short hairpin RNA against HIF-1α/2α were used to investigate the HIF-1α/2α-dependent target genes. Xenograft tumors in nude mice were established using cells affected by lentivirus, and tumor growth, angiogenesis, proliferation, and apoptosis were measured. RESULTS: HIF-1α expression was significantly associated with T stage (P = 0.004), lymph node involvement (P = 0.006), histologic differentiation (P = 0.013), and microvessel density (P = 0.014), whereas that of HIF-2α was associated with T stage (P = 0.011) and microvessel density (P = 0.005). Patients with positive HIF-1α nuclear staining had a significantly worse overall survival (P < 0.001) and disease-free survival (P < 0.001) than those with negative HIF-1α staining. When OSCC cells were cultured at 5% O(2), only HIF-2α contributed to the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor. At 1% O(2), vascular endothelial growth factor was regulated by both HIF-1α and HIF-2α, but glucose transporter 1, carbonic anhydrase 9, and urokinase-type plasminogen activator receptor were regulated by HIF-1α rather than by HIF-2α. Knocking down HIF-1α or HIF-2α individually inhibited the xenograft tumor angiogenesis and growth, and knocking them down simultaneously revealed a better inhibitory effect than knocking down either unit alone. CONCLUSIONS: HIF-1α and HIF-2α correlated with different clinical-pathologic parameters, stabilized at different oxygen levels, and regulated different genes in OSCC. However, both HIF-1α and HIF-2α showed promoting roles in tumor angiogenesis and growth, and therapeutic outcome may benefit from combined targeting of HIF-1α and HIF-2α.
目的:本研究旨在探讨缺氧诱导因子(HIF)-1α与 HIF-2α在口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)中的功能差异。
实验设计:通过免疫组织化学染色,我们评估了 97 例 OSCC 患者中 HIF-1α 和 HIF-2α表达与临床病理特征之间的相关性。使用慢病毒转染的 OSCC 细胞系来研究 HIF-1α/2α依赖性靶基因。使用受慢病毒影响的细胞在裸鼠中建立异种移植肿瘤,并测量肿瘤生长、血管生成、增殖和凋亡。
结果:HIF-1α 表达与 T 分期(P = 0.004)、淋巴结受累(P = 0.006)、组织学分化(P = 0.013)和微血管密度(P = 0.014)显著相关,而 HIF-2α 与 T 分期(P = 0.011)和微血管密度(P = 0.005)相关。HIF-1α 核染色阳性的患者总生存率(P < 0.001)和无病生存率(P < 0.001)明显低于 HIF-1α 染色阴性的患者。当 OSCC 细胞在 5%O2 下培养时,只有 HIF-2α 有助于血管内皮生长因子的表达。在 1%O2 下,血管内皮生长因子受 HIF-1α 和 HIF-2α 共同调节,但葡萄糖转运蛋白 1、碳酸酐酶 9 和尿激酶型纤溶酶原激活物受体受 HIF-1α 调节,而不受 HIF-2α 调节。单独敲低 HIF-1α 或 HIF-2α 均可抑制异种移植肿瘤的血管生成和生长,同时敲低两者比单独敲低任何一个都有更好的抑制效果。
结论:HIF-1α 和 HIF-2α 与不同的临床病理参数相关,在不同的氧水平下稳定,并在 OSCC 中调节不同的基因。然而,HIF-1α 和 HIF-2α 均在肿瘤血管生成和生长中起促进作用,联合靶向 HIF-1α 和 HIF-2α 可能会带来更好的治疗效果。
J Vasc Surg. 2012-1-24
Bioinformation. 2025-4-30
World J Exp Med. 2025-6-20
Histol Histopathol. 2024-8
Front Oral Health. 2021-2-22
Int J Mol Sci. 2021-7-28
Biomolecules. 2021-1-12