Ghent University-INTEC/IBBT, Gaston Crommenlaan 8 box 201, B-9050 Ghent, Belgium.
Phys Med Biol. 2010 Sep 21;55(18):5541-55. doi: 10.1088/0031-9155/55/18/018. Epub 2010 Aug 31.
The environment is an important parameter when evaluating the exposure to radio-frequency electromagnetic fields. This study investigates numerically the variation on the whole-body and peak spatially averaged-specific absorption rate (SAR) in the heterogeneous virtual family male placed in front of a base station antenna in a reflective environment. The SAR values in a reflective environment are also compared to the values obtained when no environment is present (free space). The virtual family male has been placed at four distances (30 cm, 1 m, 3 m and 10 m) in front of six base station antennas (operating at 300 MHz, 450 MHz, 900 MHz, 2.1 GHz, 3.5 GHz and 5.0 GHz, respectively) and in three reflective environments (a perfectly conducting wall, a perfectly conducting ground and a perfectly conducting ground + wall). A total of 72 configurations are examined. The absorption in the heterogeneous body model is determined using the 3D electromagnetic (EM) finite-difference time-domain (FDTD) solver Semcad-X. For the larger simulations, requirements in terms of computer resources are reduced by using a generalized Huygens' box approach. It has been observed that the ratio of the SAR in the virtual family male in a reflective environment and the SAR in the virtual family male in the free-space environment ranged from -8.7 dB up to 8.0 dB. A worst-case reflective environment could not be determined. ICNIRP reference levels not always showed to be compliant with the basic restrictions.
环境是评估射频电磁场暴露的一个重要参数。本研究通过数值方法研究了放置在基站天线前的不均匀虚拟家庭男性模型的全身和峰值空间平均比吸收率(SAR)在反射环境中的变化。还将反射环境中的 SAR 值与无环境(自由空间)时获得的值进行了比较。虚拟家庭男性被放置在六个基站天线(分别在 300MHz、450MHz、900MHz、2.1GHz、3.5GHz 和 5.0GHz 下工作)前的四个距离(30cm、1m、3m 和 10m)以及三个反射环境(完全导电的墙壁、完全导电的地面和完全导电的墙壁+地面)中。总共检查了 72 种配置。使用 3D 电磁(EM)有限差分时域(FDTD)求解器 Semcad-X 确定不均匀体模型中的吸收。对于较大的模拟,通过使用广义惠更斯盒方法,可以减少对计算机资源的要求。观察到,在反射环境中的虚拟家庭男性的 SAR 与在自由空间环境中的虚拟家庭男性的 SAR 的比值范围从-8.7dB 到 8.0dB。无法确定最坏的反射环境。ICNIRP 参考水平并不总是符合基本限制。