Department of Neurological Surgery, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania 19107, USA.
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Sep;13(3):360-6. doi: 10.3171/2010.3.SPINE09806.
The reported incidence of complications in spine surgery varies widely. Variable study methodologies may open differing avenues for potential bias, and unclear definitions of perioperative complication make analysis of the literature challenging. Although numerous studies have examined the morbidity associated with specific procedures or diagnoses, no prospective analysis has evaluated the impact of preoperative diagnosis on overall early morbidity in spine surgery. To accurately assess perioperative morbidity in patients undergoing spine surgery, a prospective analysis of all patients who underwent spine surgery by the neurosurgical service at a large tertiary care center over a 6-month period was conducted. The correlation between preoperative diagnosis and the incidence of postoperative complications was assessed.
Data were prospectively collected on 248 consecutive patients undergoing spine surgery performed by the neurosurgical service at the Thomas Jefferson University Hospital from May to December 2008. A standardized definition of minor and major complications was applied to all adverse events occurring within 30 days of surgery. Data on diagnosis, complications, and length of stay were retrospectively assessed using stepwise multivariate analysis. Patients were analyzed by preoperative diagnosis (neoplasm, infection, degenerative disease, trauma) and level of surgery (cervical or thoracolumbar).
Total early complication incidence was 53.2%, with a minor complication incidence of 46.4% and a major complication incidence of 21.3%. Preoperative diagnosis correlated only with the occurrence of minor complications in the overall cohort (p = 0.02). In patients undergoing surgery of the thoracolumbar spine, preoperative diagnosis correlated with presence of a complication and the number of complications (p = 0.003). Within this group, patients with preoperative diagnoses of infection and neoplasm were more often affected by isolated and multiple complications (p = 0.05 and p = 0.02, respectively). Surgeries across the cervicothoracic and thoracolumbar junctions were associated with higher incidences of overall complication than cervical or lumbar surgery alone (p = 0.04 and p = 0.03, respectively). Median length of stay was 5 days for patients without a complication. Length of stay was significantly greater for patients with a minor complication (10 days, p < 0.0001) and even greater for patients with a major complication (14 days, p < 0.0001).
The incidence of complications found in this prospective analysis is higher than that reported in previous studies. This association may be due to a greater accuracy of record-keeping, absence of recall bias via prospective data collection, high complexity of pathology and surgical approaches, or application of a more liberal definition of what constitutes a complication. Further large-scale prospective studies using clear definitions of complication are necessary to ascertain the true incidence of early postoperative complications in spine surgery.
脊柱手术相关并发症的报道发生率差异较大。不同的研究方法可能为潜在偏倚开辟不同的途径,且围手术期并发症定义不明确,这使得文献分析具有挑战性。虽然许多研究已经检查了与特定手术或诊断相关的发病率,但尚无前瞻性分析评估术前诊断对脊柱手术总体早期发病率的影响。为了准确评估脊柱手术患者的围手术期发病率,对在一家大型三级护理中心神经外科服务接受脊柱手术的 248 例连续患者进行了前瞻性分析。评估了术前诊断与术后并发症发生率之间的相关性。
2008 年 5 月至 12 月,托马斯杰斐逊大学医院神经外科服务对 248 例连续接受脊柱手术的患者进行了前瞻性数据收集。对所有发生在手术 30 天内的不良事件应用了轻微和主要并发症的标准化定义。使用逐步多元分析回顾性评估诊断、并发症和住院时间的数据。患者按术前诊断(肿瘤、感染、退行性疾病、创伤)和手术水平(颈椎或胸腰椎)进行分析。
总早期并发症发生率为 53.2%,轻微并发症发生率为 46.4%,主要并发症发生率为 21.3%。术前诊断仅与整体队列中轻微并发症的发生相关(p=0.02)。在胸腰椎手术患者中,术前诊断与并发症的发生和并发症的数量相关(p=0.003)。在这一组中,术前诊断为感染和肿瘤的患者更常受到单一和多个并发症的影响(p=0.05 和 p=0.02)。颈椎胸段和胸腰椎交界处的手术与单独颈椎或腰椎手术相比,总体并发症发生率更高(p=0.04 和 p=0.03)。无并发症患者的中位住院时间为 5 天。轻微并发症患者的住院时间明显延长(10 天,p<0.0001),主要并发症患者的住院时间甚至更长(14 天,p<0.0001)。
本前瞻性分析中发现的并发症发生率高于以往研究报道的发生率。这种关联可能是由于记录保存的准确性更高、通过前瞻性数据收集消除了回忆偏倚、病理学和手术方法的复杂性较高,或者更广泛地定义了什么是并发症。需要进一步开展使用明确并发症定义的大规模前瞻性研究,以确定脊柱手术早期术后并发症的真实发生率。