Department of Psychology, Harvard University, 33 Kirkland Street, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA.
Psychol Med. 2011 May;41(5):937-47. doi: 10.1017/S0033291710001571.
Deficits in face emotion recognition (FER) in schizophrenia are well documented, and have been proposed as a potential intermediate phenotype for schizophrenia liability. However, research on the relationship between psychosis vulnerability and FER has mixed findings and methodological limitations. Moreover, no study has yet characterized the relationship between FER ability and level of psychosis-proneness. If FER ability varies continuously with psychosis-proneness, this suggests a relationship between FER and polygenic risk factors.
We tested two large internet samples to see whether psychometric psychosis-proneness, as measured by the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief (SPQ-B), is related to differences in face emotion identification and discrimination or other face processing abilities.
Experiment 1 (n=2332) showed that psychosis-proneness predicts face emotion identification ability but not face gender identification ability. Experiment 2 (n=1514) demonstrated that psychosis-proneness also predicts performance on face emotion but not face identity discrimination. The tasks in Experiment 2 used identical stimuli and task parameters, differing only in emotion/identity judgment. Notably, the relationships demonstrated in Experiments 1 and 2 persisted even when individuals with the highest psychosis-proneness levels (the putative high-risk group) were excluded from analysis.
Our data suggest that FER ability is related to individual differences in psychosis-like characteristics in the normal population, and that these differences cannot be accounted for by differences in face processing and/or visual perception. Our results suggest that FER may provide a useful candidate intermediate phenotype.
精神分裂症患者的面部情绪识别(FER)能力存在缺陷,这一现象已被广泛记录,并被提出作为精神分裂症易感性的潜在中间表型。然而,关于精神病易感性与 FER 之间关系的研究结果喜忧参半,且存在方法学上的局限性。此外,尚无研究描述 FER 能力与精神病易感性水平之间的关系。如果 FER 能力与精神病易感性呈连续变化,这表明 FER 与多基因风险因素之间存在关系。
我们测试了两个大型互联网样本,以确定精神分裂症人格问卷简表(SPQ-B)所测量的心理精神病易感性是否与面部情绪识别和辨别能力或其他面部加工能力的差异有关。
实验 1(n=2332)表明,精神病易感性预测面部情绪识别能力,但不预测面部性别识别能力。实验 2(n=1514)表明,精神病易感性也预测面部情绪但不预测面部身份辨别能力。实验 2 中的任务使用了相同的刺激和任务参数,只是在情绪/身份判断上有所不同。值得注意的是,即使在排除了最高精神病易感性水平的个体(假定的高风险组)后,实验 1 和实验 2 中表现出的关系仍然存在。
我们的数据表明,FER 能力与正常人群中类似精神病特征的个体差异有关,而这些差异不能用面部处理和/或视觉感知的差异来解释。我们的结果表明,FER 可能提供了一个有用的候选中间表型。