Suppr超能文献

一项膝关节软骨成形术联合内侧半月板切除术的随机对照研究的 4 年结果:机械清创术与射频软骨成形术比较。

Four-year results from a randomized controlled study of knee chondroplasty with concomitant medial meniscectomy: mechanical debridement versus radiofrequency chondroplasty.

机构信息

Center of Trauma and Orthopedic Surgery, Eisenach, Germany.

出版信息

Arthroscopy. 2010 Sep;26(9 Suppl):S73-80. doi: 10.1016/j.arthro.2010.02.030.

Abstract

PURPOSE

This randomized study was undertaken to compare the effectiveness of simple mechanical debridement and 50 degrees C controlled bipolar chondroplasty.

METHODS

A total of 60 patients who had a grade III articular cartilage defect of the medial femoral condyle were included. After randomization, 30 patients underwent simple debridement of articular cartilage defects, which was performed with a mechanical shaver (mechanical shaver debridement [MSD] group). The remaining patients underwent thermal chondroplasty, which was performed with a temperature-controlled bipolar device with a constant thermo-application of a maximum of 50 degrees C (radiofrequency-based chondroplasty [RFC] group). All patients underwent partial (n = 41) or subtotal (n = 19) meniscectomy. Follow-up was undertaken 4 years postoperatively.

RESULTS

No significant differences between the preoperative findings for the 2 groups were observed. One patient from the MSD group had died, and one female patient in the RFC group was lost to follow-up. A total of 18 patients had undergone revision operations for persistent knee problems: in the MSD group, there were 8 endoprostheses, 4 osteotomies, and 2 revision arthroscopies, whereas in the RFC group, there was 1 replacement, 2 osteotomies, and 1 revision arthroscopy with subtotal medial meniscectomy. The proportion of revisions was significantly higher in the MSD group (P = .006). These patients were excluded from the evaluation. The remaining 40 patients from both groups benefited from the operation. The preoperative Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS) was 11.3 points in the MSD group and 15.5 points in the RFC group (P = .279). Patients from the MSD group had a KOOS of 53.2 points at the time of follow-up. In the RFC group the KOOS (71.8 points) was significantly higher (P < .001).

CONCLUSIONS

Compared with classical mechanical debridement, bipolar radiofrequency currently appears to be the superior method for achieving a good midterm result.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Level I, randomized controlled trial.

摘要

目的

本随机研究旨在比较单纯机械清创术和 50°C 双极软骨成形术的疗效。

方法

共纳入 60 例内侧股骨髁关节软骨 III 级损伤患者。随机分组后,30 例患者行关节软骨缺损单纯清创术,采用机械刨削器(机械刨削清创术 [MSD] 组);其余患者行热软骨成形术,采用最大恒定 50°C 控温双极设备(基于射频的软骨成形术 [RFC] 组)。所有患者均行部分(n=41)或次全(n=19)半月板切除术。术后 4 年进行随访。

结果

两组术前检查结果无显著差异。MSD 组 1 例患者死亡,RFC 组 1 例女性患者失访。共有 18 例患者因持续膝关节问题行翻修手术:MSD 组 8 例关节置换术、4 例截骨术和 2 例关节镜翻修术,RFC 组 1 例关节置换术、2 例截骨术和 1 例关节镜翻修术伴内侧半月板次全切除术。MSD 组翻修比例明显更高(P=0.006)。这些患者被排除在评估之外。两组其余 40 例患者均从手术中获益。MSD 组术前膝关节损伤和骨关节炎结果评分(KOOS)为 11.3 分,RFC 组为 15.5 分(P=0.279)。MSD 组患者随访时的 KOOS 评分为 53.2 分,RFC 组为 71.8 分(P<0.001),明显更高。

结论

与传统机械清创术相比,双极射频目前似乎是获得良好中期疗效的更优方法。

证据等级

I 级,随机对照试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验