Dallas, Texas From the Department of Plastic Surgery, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center.
Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;126(3):1063-1074. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e60537.
The use of liposuction combined with abdominoplasty has been controversial. The combination of techniques has been associated with an increased rate of venous thromboembolism and wound-healing complications. Through improvements in venous thromboembolism prophylaxis, refinements in liposuction techniques, and an understanding of anatomy, this cumulative risk has decreased, although the negative stigmata persist. This study describes the evolution of abdominal body contouring through a critical review of a single surgeon's 20-year experience with abdominoplasty. This clinical outcome analysis will highlight the significant contributions that have led to the improvement in the safety and efficacy of this technique.
A retrospective review of patients undergoing abdominoplasty procedures was performed. Patient demographics and procedural information, including postoperative course and complications, were recorded. Preoperative and postoperative photographs were scored by blinded evaluators for aesthetic result and scar quality.
Two hundred fifty patients undergoing abdominoplasty from 1987 to 2007 were included in the study. The use of a "superwet" liposuction technique in combination with abdominoplasty significantly decreased intraoperative blood loss (p < 0.04) and length of hospital stay (p < 0.05). Liposuction volume and region had no significant effect on abdominoplasty outcome, although refinements in operative technique, including abdominal and flank ultrasound-assisted liposuction, high superior tension, and limited abdominal undermining, did improve the postoperative aesthetic score. Venous thromboembolic events significantly decreased with aggressive venous thromboembolism prophylaxis (p < 0.001).
The technical evolution of a single surgeon's 20-year experience demonstrates that liposuction can be safely and effectively combined with abdominoplasty. Preoperative trunk analysis, intraoperative surgical refinements including superwet technique and ultrasound-assisted liposuction, and perioperative venous thromboembolism prophylaxis significantly improve the outcome of abdominoplasty.
吸脂术与腹部整形术的联合应用一直存在争议。联合应用这些技术会增加静脉血栓栓塞和伤口愈合并发症的发生率。通过静脉血栓栓塞预防措施的改进、吸脂技术的改进以及对解剖结构的理解,尽管负面痕迹仍然存在,但这种累积风险已经降低。本研究通过对一位外科医生 20 年腹部整形经验的回顾性分析,描述了腹部形体塑造的演变过程。这项临床结果分析将突出显示那些导致该技术安全性和有效性提高的重要贡献。
对接受腹部整形手术的患者进行回顾性研究。记录患者的人口统计学资料和手术信息,包括术后过程和并发症。由盲法评估者对术前和术后照片进行评分,以评估美容效果和疤痕质量。
本研究共纳入 1987 年至 2007 年间接受腹部整形术的 250 例患者。将“超湿”吸脂技术与腹部整形术联合应用可显著减少术中失血量(p<0.04)和住院时间(p<0.05)。吸脂量和区域对腹部整形效果没有显著影响,但手术技术的改进,包括腹部和侧腹超声辅助吸脂、高张力和有限的腹部皮下组织分离,确实提高了术后美容评分。积极的静脉血栓栓塞预防措施显著降低了静脉血栓栓塞事件的发生率(p<0.001)。
一位外科医生 20 年经验的技术演变表明,吸脂术可以与腹部整形术安全有效地联合应用。术前躯干分析、术中手术改进(包括超湿技术和超声辅助吸脂术)以及围手术期静脉血栓栓塞预防措施显著改善了腹部整形术的效果。