Translational Neuropharmacology, Center for Molecular Medicine, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Int Rev Neurobiol. 2010;91:129-71. doi: 10.1016/S0074-7742(10)91005-2.
Much research on experimental animals that is aimed to decipher genetic factors involved in alcoholism has been devoted to either models of innate alcohol-related phenotypes or responses after acute alcohol challenge. Such focus has, however, limitations when it comes to the pathogenetic mechanism underlying alcohol addiction, because the progression into the disorder takes years and genetic as well as environmental factors may exert different influences along this trajectory. Animal models of the neuroadaptations involved in the development of dependence exist, but have been difficult to implement for genetic and genomics analysis. Consequently, currently available data have been difficult to reconcile with the human condition and could be misleading in predicting targets for medication development. This review will illustrate strengths and pitfalls of genomic approaches in rodent models of alcoholism and emphasize the need for convergent lines of evidence to improve the predictive value of such studies. Examples of a convergent research approach include validation studies for Agt, Arrb2, Crhr1, Grin3a, and Npy.
许多旨在破译与酗酒相关的遗传因素的实验动物研究,要么针对先天与酒精相关的表型模型,要么针对急性酒精挑战后的反应。然而,当涉及到酒精成瘾的发病机制时,这种关注存在局限性,因为进展到这种疾病需要数年时间,遗传和环境因素可能会在这个过程中产生不同的影响。涉及依赖发展的神经适应的动物模型已经存在,但由于遗传和基因组学分析方面的困难,这些模型难以实施。因此,目前可用的数据与人类状况难以协调,并且在预测药物开发靶点方面可能具有误导性。本综述将说明基因组方法在酗酒的啮齿动物模型中的优势和缺陷,并强调需要采用趋同的证据来提高此类研究的预测价值。趋同研究方法的例子包括 Agt、Arrb2、Crhr1、Grin3a 和 Npy 的验证研究。