Sleep and Performance Research Center, Washington State University Spokane, USA.
J Biomech. 2010 Dec 1;43(16):3214-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.08.013. Epub 2010 Sep 1.
Sleepiness is a major risk factor in traffic- and occupational accidents. While sleepiness is a persistent concern, there is no convenient test to monitor impending levels of sleepiness. We show that force platform posturographic balance testing addresses this need because it estimates time awake (TA) accurately and precisely. Testing the TA is appropriate because TA drives the sleep homeostatic process, a component in sleepiness. With 12 subjects we evaluated the accuracy and precision of repeated estimates of TA. Our extended study design that allows evaluating the accuracy and precision of posturographic TA-estimates is new. First, we tested the subjects' balance every 2 h during 36 h of sustained wakefulness. This comprised the subjects' reference curves (balance as a function of known and increasing TA). Then, we tested the subjects' balance once a day over one week. We also tested the subjects' balance once a week over one month. Finally, to estimate the subjects' TA, we equated the balance scores with the scores in their reference curves. The accuracy of the estimates was 86%, and the precision was 97%. The high accuracy and precision of the estimates obtained with this one-month protocol validates the method of posturographic monitoring of sleepiness. So far, force platform posturographic balance testing has generally been used for clinical purposes, to quantify balance control and musculoskeletal performance. Our main result is that we now validated that balance testing provides accurate and precise estimates of TA, and hence, also provides an approach towards an automated monitor of sleepiness.
困意是引发交通和职业事故的主要风险因素之一。尽管困意是一个持续存在的问题,但目前还没有方便的测试方法来监测即将到来的困意水平。我们表明,力台平衡测试可以满足这一需求,因为它可以准确和精确地估计清醒时间(TA)。测试 TA 是合适的,因为 TA 驱动着睡眠稳态过程,这是困意的一个组成部分。我们用 12 名被试者评估了 TA 重复估计的准确性和精确性。我们的扩展研究设计允许评估力台平衡 TA 估计的准确性和精确性,这是新的。首先,我们在 36 小时的持续清醒中,每 2 小时测试一次被试者的平衡。这包括被试者的参考曲线(平衡作为已知和不断增加的 TA 的函数)。然后,我们在一周内每天测试一次被试者的平衡。我们还在一个月内每周测试一次被试者的平衡。最后,为了估计被试者的 TA,我们将平衡得分与参考曲线中的得分进行了匹配。估计的准确性为 86%,精确性为 97%。这个一个月的方案获得的高准确性和精确性验证了力台平衡监测困意的方法。到目前为止,力台平衡测试通常用于临床目的,以量化平衡控制和肌肉骨骼性能。我们的主要结果是,我们现在验证了平衡测试可以提供准确和精确的 TA 估计,因此,也提供了一种自动化监测困意的方法。