Wang Ze-xin, Wang Sen-ming, Zhou Qi, Hu Xi-gang, Zhu Wei-liang, Meng Hui, Zhang Ji-ren
Department of Oncology, Chongqing Fuling Central Hospital, Chongqing 408000, China.
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao. 2010 Aug;30(8):1903-5.
To study the antiangiogenetic and tumor inhibitory effects of endostatin (Es) by intratumoral versus intravenous administration combined with adriamycin (Adm) for treatment of transplanted tumor in mice.
Forty mice were subjected to subcutaneous implantation of H22 cells and randomly divided into 4 groups by the body weight when the tumor diameter reached 1 cm, namely the control group (with intratumoral and intravenous injection of normal saline), Es intratumoral group (with intratumoral injection Es and intraperitoneal Adm injection), Es vein group (with intravenous Es injection and intraperitoneal Adm injection), and Adm group (with intratumoral saline injection and intraperitoneal Adm injection). The tumor volumes and tumor inhibition rates were calculated, and the expression of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and the microvessel density (MVD) of the tumors were examined, with the survival time of the mice also observed.
The tumor volume was smaller in Es intratumoral group than in the other groups (P<0.05). The expression of VEGF and M VD in Es intratumoral group was significantly decreased as compared with that in the other groups (P<0.05). The survival time was significantly longer in Es intratumoral group and Es vein group than in the other groups (P<0.05), but showed no significant difference between Es intratumoral group and Es vein group (P>0.05).
In combination with Adm regimen, Es given intratumoral injection produces better effect than intravenous Es injection against angiogenesis and tumor growth, no significant difference can be found in the survival time between them.
研究内皮抑素(Es)瘤内注射与静脉注射联合阿霉素(Adm)对小鼠移植瘤的抗血管生成及抑瘤作用。
40只小鼠皮下接种H22细胞,待肿瘤直径达1 cm时按体重随机分为4组,即对照组(瘤内及静脉注射生理盐水)、Es瘤内组(瘤内注射Es并腹腔注射Adm)、Es静脉组(静脉注射Es并腹腔注射Adm)、Adm组(瘤内注射生理盐水并腹腔注射Adm)。计算肿瘤体积及抑瘤率,检测肿瘤血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)表达及微血管密度(MVD),并观察小鼠生存时间。
Es瘤内组肿瘤体积小于其他各组(P<0.05)。Es瘤内组VEGF表达及MVD较其他各组显著降低(P<0.05)。Es瘤内组和Es静脉组生存时间显著长于其他各组(P<0.05),但Es瘤内组与Es静脉组之间无显著差异(P>0.05)。
与Adm方案联合时,Es瘤内注射在抗血管生成及抑制肿瘤生长方面比静脉注射效果更好,二者生存时间无显著差异。