Division of Vitreoretinal Diseases and Surgery, Vanderbilt Eye Institute, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.
Ophthalmology. 2010 Sep;117(9):1851-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2010.06.014.
To review available peer-reviewed publications to evaluate the safety profile and visual outcomes associated with small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy.
Literature searches of the PubMed and the Cochrane Library databases were last conducted on August 5, 2009, with no date restrictions. The searches were limited to articles published in English. These searches retrieved 328 articles, of which 76 were deemed topically relevant and rated according to strength of evidence.
On the basis of level II and level III evidence, the overall safety profile of small-gauge pars plana vitrectomy is similar to that established for conventional 20-gauge pars plana vitrectomy and provides comparable visual acuity results. An increased incidence of infectious endophthalmitis after 25-gauge vitrectomy was reported in 2 comparative studies, but this was not found in multiple, larger, more recent studies, perhaps due to modifications in case selection and surgical technique over time. Compared with 20-gauge vitrectomy, small-gauge vitrectomy is associated with significantly lower levels of patient discomfort and ocular inflammation, and the time required for improvement in visual acuity is shorter.
The technological advances of small-gauge vitrectomy seem to afford visual benefit comparable with that seen with traditional 20-gauge surgery, with more rapid healing, less discomfort, and an acceptably low incidence of adverse events comparable with those observed with conventional 20-gauge vitrectomy. As surgical techniques evolve and clinical experience grows, continued close surveillance is necessary for an accurate assessment of complications.
回顾现有的同行评议文献,评估小口径经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术的安全性概况和视觉结果。
于 2009 年 8 月 5 日最后一次在 PubMed 和 Cochrane 图书馆数据库中进行文献检索,无日期限制。检索仅限于以英文发表的文章。这些检索共检索到 328 篇文章,其中 76 篇被认为与主题相关,并根据证据强度进行了评分。
基于 II 级和 III 级证据,小口径经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术的总体安全性与传统 20 号经睫状体平坦部玻璃体切割术相似,提供可比的视力结果。在 2 项比较研究中报道了 25 号玻璃体切割术后感染性眼内炎的发生率增加,但在多个更大、更新的研究中并未发现,这可能是由于随着时间的推移病例选择和手术技术的改变。与 20 号玻璃体切割术相比,小口径玻璃体切割术与患者不适感和眼内炎症程度显著降低有关,视力恢复所需的时间更短。
小口径玻璃体切割术的技术进步似乎提供了与传统 20 号手术相当的视觉益处,具有更快的愈合、更少的不适和可接受的低不良事件发生率,与传统 20 号玻璃体切割术观察到的结果相当。随着手术技术的发展和临床经验的积累,需要持续密切监测,以准确评估并发症。